Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Fir, Jerry Koblitz - 2 - June 21, 1990 <br />3. Please re-work the soii erosion analysis. The bond release regulations <br />(Rule 3.03.1(3)(b)) discuss comparisons of pre-mine and post-mine <br />contributions of suspended solids to surface drainage outside of the <br />permit area. The pond removal regulations (4.05.2(2)) require two <br />demonstrations. Like bond release, a comparison must be generated <br />between suspended solids generation on the pre-mine and post-mine <br />topography, but in addition a demonstration must be made that untreated <br />drainage from the disturbed areas meets state and federal water quality <br />standards for receiving streams at Canadian Strip. This means that you <br />must address all NPDES parameters as well as the receiving stream <br />standards as listed in the enclosure. While Wyoming Fuels must address <br />suspended solids generation as apart of the bond release, it is not <br />mandatory to evaluate the pond removal criteria at this time. (However, <br />I thought that was your intention.) <br />The Division's Bond Release Memorandum suggests that the suspended solids <br />comparison be performed using Williams' modified Universal Soil Loss <br />Equation (MUSLE). This equation predicts sediment yield from a specific <br />storm event. USLE, the equation you utilized, predicts average annual <br />soil loss from a watershed. The Division recommended the use of MUSLE to <br />enable predictive modeling which would satisfy the pond removal criteria. <br />There have been manly modifications to the Universal Soil Loss Equation <br />(USLE), as you are well aware. MUSLE was developed following the <br />evaluation of 778 storms on watersheds ranging in size from 2.7 acres to <br />2,380 acres and slopes ranging from 0.94ti-5.44. The post-mining <br />topography at Canadian has some slopes of 250, so it may be inappropriate <br />to use MUSLE. A modification of MUSLE entitle RUSLE was developed to <br />handle steeper slopes and may be more appropriate. <br />a. Comparison of erosion loss should be made on similar watersheds. <br />Either compare the disturbed area's pre~nine and post-mine <br />topography throughout its entire extent or compare the post-mine <br />topography at Canadian with a Jackson County watershed of similar <br />size, shape, soil type and slope. Map those watersheds and <br />delineate the subwatersheds which are used in your evaluation as <br />you did previously. <br />b. If Wyoming Fuels desires a pond removal evaluation from the <br />Division, please utilize a soil loss equation which incorporates a <br />16-year, 24-hour event in the calculations. The 1D-year, 24-hour <br />event is requested as our regulations require that sediment ponds <br />be sized to handle an event of that size. Results should be listed <br />as mg/1 for Total Suspended Solids or mg/m1 for Total Settleable <br />Solids. <br />c. In addition, if Wyoming Fuels desires a pond removal evaluation <br />from the Division, please provide results of influent water quality <br />sampling for both Ponds 001 and 002. Include all parameters for <br />which there are NPDES requirements as well as receiving stream <br />standards. <br />