Laserfiche WebLink
<br />June 8, 1990 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />This is a distinct possibility if substantial swell of <br />material is experienced in the later phases. Under th <br />permit RRI would only be able to reclaim to the arbitr <br />boundary beneath the cliffs. Without an amendment, RR <br />unable to propose a TR which would take advantage of th <br />topography and eliminate a dangerous and ugly site feat <br />Second, RRI has noted that in later phases, the diver <br />from the Columbia Ditch may be changed. Again, RRI p <br />submit a TR if and when the relocation became necess~ <br />option is not available unless the permitted acreage is <br />and the boundary changed in such a way to include <br />portion of the ditch within the permit area. <br />excavated <br />existing <br />pry permit <br />would be <br />existing <br />~n point <br />posed to <br />This <br />southern <br />For these reasons, RRI is submitting a revised Plate 4. The June <br />8, 1990 Revision of Plate 4 depicts a permit area of 192 cres, and <br />will provide RRI with needed flexibility for fu ure mine <br />operations. The affected areas for purposes of bond'nq remain <br />unchanged. <br />RRI believes the change in boundary is appropriate as <br />this permit amendment. Interested parties have been nc <br />will have opportunity to comment on the change. The c <br />not alter the list of adjacent landowners. The change <br />effect the mine plan, or reclamation plan. Instead, <br />provides a simplified permitting procedure so that in <br />additional, desirable reclamation may be accomplished. <br />Sincerely, <br />LAW OFFICES OF J. KEMPER WILL <br />C? ~~.~~~ <br />h P. Schmuck <br />/JPS <br />Enclosures <br />cc: Park County Clerk and Recorder <br />Reclamation Resources <br />Diane Nelson <br />part of <br />.fied and <br />nge does <br />does not <br />e change <br />e future <br />OJN12 <br />