Laserfiche WebLink
1) contemporaneous reclamation. C.F. Section <br />34-32-116(7)(9), C.R.S. (1988), Rule 6 (reclaim with reasonable <br />diligence within 5 years); Rule 6.1(3); § 34-32-112(3), C.R.S. <br />(1988) (scheduling and stages); § 34-32-112(7), C.R.S. (1988) <br />(extension of time); <br />2) The proposed final reclamation, including: <br />i. post-mining use. C.F. Section <br />34-32-109(6), C.R.S. (1988) (compliance with land use regula- <br />tion); § 34-32-115(4)(c), C.R.S. (1988), Rule 1.5.5(4) (proposed <br />future use contrary to laws or regulations); § 34-32-116(2) and <br />(7)(j) and (p), C.R.S. (1988), Rule 5 (operator's designation of <br />land use); <br />ii. Slope configuration C.F. Rule 6.1; <br />iii. Bench widths, C.F. Section <br />34-32-116(7)(a), (h) and (i), C.R.S. (1988), Rule 6.1; <br />iv. Highwall Heights, C.F. Section <br />34-32-116(7)(a), (h) and (i), C.R.S. (1988), Rule 6.1; <br />v. Topsoil and subsoil replacement, <br />C.F. Section 34-32-116(7)(f), C.R.S. (1988), Rule 6.4; <br />vi. Revegetation. C.F. Section <br />34-32-116(7)(e), C.R.S. (1988), Rule 6.5. <br />3) soil erosion control and surface drainage <br />impacts. C.F. Section 34-32-116(7)(9), (h) and (i), C.R.S. <br />(1988), Rules 6.1(2) and 6.2. <br />4) off-site impacts due to rock slides. <br />b. Zn addition, at the time of the May hearing the <br />Division had not made any recommendation concerning the financial <br />warranty. Accordingly, the Board hereby determines that evidence <br />and arguments concerning the amount of the financial warranty <br />will be permitted. <br />3. Procedure. <br />The following order of presentation shall govern the recon- <br />vened hearing at the December Board meeting. The time limits set <br />out below shall be strictly enforced. However, the Board, in its <br />discretion, for good cause shown may allot limited additional <br />time if further evidence on a specific point is warranted. The <br />-2- <br />