Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ ~~ y <br />.I <br />These measured parameters generate safety factors of 1.6 (static) and 1.1 (dynamic), following <br />the same computations reported in our submission of January 9, 1996. <br />The original of this letter is accompanied by colored photographs of the liner subjected to <br />loading, the graphs for friction angles and cohesion, and the output of the stability analysis. <br />The second attachment reports the liner load testing of 100 mil textured (one side) LLDPE on <br />Soli Liner Fill that had a 2" rock from that SLF material artificially placed in a manner to <br />expose a sharp edge on the upper surface of the SLF such that the sharp edge contacted the <br />synthetic liner. There are photographs accompanying the second attachment which show the <br />rock and a cross section of the sample after testing. <br />Two tests were performed because the Soil Liner Fill for the first test could not be removed <br />from the test cell in a manner that allowed an "after" photograph. Both tests were acceptable <br />in that no holes or vacuum leaks were formed in the tested synthetic material. <br />inform us of any questions at your earliest convenience. <br />E. Hardaway <br />Eger, Environmental Affairs <br />Attachments: (2) 1. Letter from Golder Associates dated February 9, 1996 "Liner Load <br />and Interface Shear Strength Test Results for 100 mil Textured LLDPE <br />Geomembrane." <br />2. Letter from Golder Associates dated February 6, 1996 "Cresson Liner <br />Load Testing." <br />2 <br />