My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV92120
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV92120
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:35 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:18:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/16/1996
Doc Name
MIDTERM REVIEW RESPONSE REVIEW FOIDEL CREEK MINE PN C-82-056
From
DMG
To
KENT GORHAM
Type & Sequence
MT3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
azea crossing the shaded azea neaz pond E should be shaded. This is the permanent <br />road approved under the CYCC permit and it would be TCCs liability to restore this <br />road through this area. I also noted that some outlying areas aze not shown or <br />footnoted on this map (#7 N. Escape Shaft, EMD dewater, EMD vent). These may <br />have a Figure associated with them which depicts the topsoil piles as labeled in Table <br />49a. I will leave it up to you how to handle this, if the need exists. <br />Original Question <br />2. Pond T topsoil pile is not included in the SAE text discussion on page 2.05-28. All <br />approved SAE areas for the Foidel Creek mine should be included in this portion <br />of the text and appropriate calculations should be included as part of Exhibit 8. <br />TCC response <br />Page 2.05-28 has been revised to include discussion of the Pond T topsoil stockpile <br />SAE in the text. The calculations for this SAE can be inserted into Exhibit 8. <br />DMG response <br />The wording does not accurately reflect the location of the pile, but I will leave it to <br />you to pursue this as an issue should you choose to. The calculations are fine. I also <br />noticed a typo in Table 49a in the volume number for the North Escape Shaft topsoil <br />pile. <br />Original Question <br />3. Some reclamation plan text is mixed in with the operation plan information (i.e. p. <br />2.05-27(b)). This information should be moved to the text which responds to the <br />reclamation plan beginning on page 2.05-54(g). <br />I did not review this section for adequacy. <br />Original Question <br />4. Inspection of cross-sections depicted on Map 25 and the post-mining topography as <br />depicted on Map 31 indicate some discrepancies. Rough volumetric calculations <br />using this information reveal a shortage of material presently exists to achieve the <br />approved post-mining topography in the area of the main mine facilities. In addition, <br />no defined drainage ways are planned over this slope, but at least three areas appear <br />to exist where drainageways will need to be designed due to topographic relief above <br />the portal azea. Bond calculations at the present time can only be estimated due to <br />the lack of accurate backfilling and grading information in this azea. <br />The Division requires the following information be submitted: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.