My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV92120
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV92120
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:35 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:18:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/16/1996
Doc Name
MIDTERM REVIEW RESPONSE REVIEW FOIDEL CREEK MINE PN C-82-056
From
DMG
To
KENT GORHAM
Type & Sequence
MT3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iiiiiiiiiiiiimiii <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Dep, rlmem ul Nalnral Rrsourc r. <br />111 I $hrrmdn SI Roum ? I S <br />I lcnvri. Gslu~ddn NUlll i <br />Vhune 13113) 8663567 <br />f AX.1 IP 31 K3' III U6 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />~I~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Date: December 16, 1996 <br />To: Janet Binns <br />From: Kent Gorham ;~~',~~~ <br />s <br />~ _. ' " <br />CC: Dan Hernandez <br />RE: Midterm Review Response Review <br />Foidel Creek Mine <br />Permit #C-S2-056 <br />Roy Romer <br />Govemo~ <br />lames 5. Lochhead <br />E ae~'mive Dueaor <br />M¢hael B Long <br />Dbision Director <br />As per your memo of November 21, 1996, I have completed review of my assigned portion <br />of the Twentymile Coal Co. responses to our questions raised in the midterm review. Since <br />I am somewhat familiar with this site and raised this issues originally, I added any comments <br />on anything else not specifically assigned to me which 1 thought might assist your review. <br />i have listed my original question, TCC's response, and my subsequent response following <br />this review. <br />Orieinal Question <br />Map 29 "clouds" as described on page 2.05-55 of the permit text apparently were <br />inadvertently removed from Map 29 during MR-131 or an earlier revision. This <br />designation was included to indicate that a particular topsoil pile was to be replaced <br />solely on the particular area from which it was removed. Also, Pond E relocation <br />does not show up accurately on the currently approved copy of Map 29. Possibly the <br />wrong copy of Map 29 was inadvertently updated during one of the latest revisions. <br />Please accurately add this information back to Map 29 as originally approved. <br />TCC response <br />Map 29 has been modified to show the clouds previously depicted and this map can <br />be inserted into the permit. <br />DMG response <br />This map appears appropriate in restoring"clouds". However, the non-shaded road <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.