My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV92047
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV92047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:31 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:17:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1985043
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/19/2001
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />no take of the Mexican spotted owl would occur and no Incidental Take Permit or HCP would be <br />needed. If mining should occur to the north of the boundary lines the Service believes that incidental <br />take of the owl could occur necessitating an Incidental Take Permit and HCP. <br />On April 30, 1997, Terry Ireland met with you and others to describe the concerns of the Service, the <br />HCP process, and actions that could be taken to reduce impacts to the owls. According to Mr. <br />Ireland's notes, mining in the southern half of the School section was discussed as an alternative to <br />mining the entire School section with the understanding that a HCP would still be needed. It was also <br />stated that disturbance at any one time would not exceed 12 acres. In an April 15, 1997, letter from <br />the Colorado Division of Wildlife, the Division supported this disturbance limit. The Service concurs <br />with CDOW in their recommendation as this will provide a faster turn around time for vegetation to <br />reestablish versus a lazger azea. Additionally, there was past discussion of mining operations taking <br />place only during the daytime. The Service still recommends operations only take place in the <br />daytime to limit noise disturbance to the owls during their active periods at night. <br />If mining to the north of the boundary lines on the topographic map is pursued, the Service would <br />prefer that the Incidental Take Permit be issued to the Colorado State Land Boazd since the State is <br />the owner of the School section and has authority over activities on the land. However, the Service <br />does not object to Rocky Mountain Asphalt developing the HCP and draft Incidental Take Permit <br />with the Service and could be the Incidental Take Pemut holder. Others, including the Colorado <br />State Laad Board permit holder (Bob Stack), the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology, the <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife, and the BLM may be parties to the HCP and Incidental Take Permit or <br />provide information during the process. <br />If the Service can be of further assistance, please contact Teny Ireland at the letterhead address or <br />(970}243-2778. <br />Sincerely, <br />- ~ '".~ <br />`d <br />Richard P. Krueger <br />Acting Assistant Colorado Field Supervisor <br />Enclosure <br />pc: FWS/ES, Lakewood <br />Colorado State Land Board, Denver {Attn: Mark Davis) <br />CDMG, Denver {Attn: Jim Dillie) <br />CDOW, Durango (Attn: Chris Kloster) <br />CDOW, Colorado Springs <br />BLM, Canon City (Attn: Erik Brekke) <br />T lyderd: RockyMtnHCP.lv;071000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.