My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV92047
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV92047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:31 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:17:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1985043
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/19/2001
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />APPLICATION FORA HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER A PERMIT SHOULD BE <br />GRANTED. <br />(2) PRIOR TO HOLDING A HEARING, THE BOARD OR THE OFFICE <br />SHALL PROVIDE NOTICE TO ANY PERSON WHO FILED A PROTEST OR PETITION <br />FOR A HEARING OR STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION PURSUANT <br />TO SECTION 34-32.5-114. NOTICE OF THE TIME, DATE, ANO LOCATION <br />OF THE HEARING SHALL BE PUBLISHED IN A NEWSPAPER OF GENERAL <br />CIRCULATION IN THE LOCALITY OF THE PROPOSED MINING OPERATION ONCE <br />A WEEK FOR THE TWO CONSECUTIVE WEEKS IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE <br />HEARING. THE HEARING SHALL BE CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 4 OF <br />TITLE 24, C.R.S. A FINAL DECISION ON THE APPLICATION SHALL BE <br />MADE WITHIN ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DAYS AFTER THE RECEIPT OF THE <br />APPLICATION. IN THE EVENT OF COMPLEX APPLICATIONS, SERIOUS <br />UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES, OR SIGNIFICANT SNOW COVER ON THE <br />AFFECTED LAND THAT PREVENTS A NECESSARY ON-SITE INSPECTION, THE <br />BOARD MAY REASONABLY EXTEND THE TIME IN WHICH A FINAL DECISION <br />MUST BE MADE BY SIXTY DAYS. <br />(3) IF ACTION UPON AN APPLICATION IS NOT COMPLETED WITHIN <br />THE PERIOD SPECIFIED 1N SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTION, THE PERMIT <br />SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE APPROVED AND SHALL BE PROMPTLY ISSUED <br />UPON .PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT OF A FINANCIAL WARRANTY IN THE <br />AMOUNT OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER ACRE AFFECTED, OR SUCH OTHER <br />AMOUNT AS DETERMINED BY THE BOARD. <br />(4) IN THE DETERMINATION OF WHETHER THE BOARD OR THE OFFICE <br />SHALL GRANT A PERMIT TO AN OPERATOR, THE APPLICANT MUST COMPLY <br />WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE AND SECTION 24-4-105 (7), <br />C.R.S. THE BOARD OR OFFICE SHALL NOT DENY A PERMIT EXCEPT ON ONE <br />OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS: <br />(a) THE APPLICATION IS INCOMPLETE AND THE PERFORMANCE AND - <br />FINANCIAL WARRANTIES HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED; <br />(b) THE APPLICANT HAS NOT PAID THE REQUI.RED FEE; <br />(c) ANY PART OF THE PROPOSED MINING OPERATION, THE <br />RECLAMATION PROGRAM, OR THE PROPOSED FUTURE USE IS CONTRARY TO THE <br />LAWS OR REGUTATIONS OF THIS ARTICLE; <br />(d) THE PROPOSED MINING OPERATION, THE REELAMATION PROGRAM, <br />OR THE PROPOSED FUTURE USE I5 CONTRARY TO THE LAWS OR REGULATIONS <br />OF THIS STATE OR THE UNITED STATES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO <br />ALL FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL PERMITS, LICENSES, AND APPROVALS, <br />AS APPLICABLE TO THE SPECIFIC OPERATION. <br />(e) THE MINING OPERATION WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT THE <br />STABILITY Of ANY SIGNIFICANT, VALUABLE, AND PERMANENT MANMADE <br />STRUCTURES LOCATED WITHIN TWO HUNDRED FEET OF THE AFFECTED LAND; <br />EXCEPT THAT THE PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DENIED ON THIS BASIS WHERE <br />THERE IS AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OPERATOR AND THE PERSONS HAVING <br />PAGE 19-SENATE BILL 95-156 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.