Laserfiche WebLink
<br />David Berry <br />July 9, 1990 <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />RESPONSE: <br />Please refer to Minor Revision 90-10 (hydrologic Monitorying Plan), recently <br />submitted by CYCC, for the requested information. <br />MLRD CONCERN: <br />8. Please add an Exhibit which contains the information regarding the <br />Phase I bond release, and which incorporates the four maps/drawings <br />associated with the release (Maps 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3 Partial Bond <br />Release, Postmining Topo Cross Section). <br />RESPONSE: <br />As the requested information is not required under current regulations, CYCC <br />respectfully declines to create an exhibit addressing these items. <br />MLRD CONCERN: <br />PERFORMANCE STANDARD ISSUES <br />1. As previously discussed, please submit a revision which discusses the <br />status (permanent or temporary) and morphometry of the drainage ditches. <br />RESPONSE: <br />CYCC wishes to address this matter separately by means of a Technical <br />Revision, as per our previous discussion with the Division. <br />MLRD CONCERN: <br />2. The permit document does not seem to address the permanent overburden <br />pile. The document must reflect its existence and the design <br />parameters associated with it. Have we missed something? Your <br />assistance will be appreciated. <br />RESPONSE: <br />Upon review of pertinent correspondence, it appears that the permanent <br />overburden pile was exempted from certification by the Division under the <br />76-16 permit, due to interim regulations being in force at time of <br />construction. Page 2.05-67 which states the location of the Permanent <br />Overburden Stockpile has been revised to address the certification exemption <br />by the Division. <br />MLRD CONCERN: <br />3. We will be conducting a separate review of the CHIS and analysis will <br />be forthcoming. <br />MLRD CONCERN: <br />1. Please submit revised pages to incorporate Minor Revision No. 1. <br />