My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV92037
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV92037
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:31 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:17:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/16/1989
Doc Name
PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW PR 1 MARR MINE C-80-006
From
MLRD
To
KERR COAL CO
Type & Sequence
PR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 14 - <br />10.6 million cubic yards of extra material from Pit 3, nor 1.2 million <br />cubic yards of excess spoil from the 720 pit. However, Kerr may be able <br />to make a case for establishment of a small excess overburden stockpile <br />based on calculations presented in Section 4.14.4, page 4.14.8. Please <br />modify the permit revision application accordingly. <br />57. Please specify the thickness of horizontal lifts used in construction of <br />excess overburden piles per 4.09.1(7). <br />Appendix A <br />a. E. 1. Smith's 1966 Ph.D. dissertation is relied on heavily to <br />support the stated views. It is stated on page 4.06-6 that "Smith <br />reported that the big sagebrush he sampled was all mountain big <br />sagebrush," yet Smith's results are used by KCC to draw conclusions <br />about other sagebrush types. The Division believes that any <br />conclusions from Smith's 1966 study that are extrapolated to other <br />types of sagebrush may not be valid. <br />b. KCC baseline data shows that Wyoming big sagebrush only grows on <br />28.3 percent of the area to be disturbed. It is therefore unclear <br />why KCC wants to reestablish this shrub on all areas to be <br />disturbed. It is, however, clear that the topsoil redistribution <br />and reveaetation plans may not meet all the requirements of Rules <br />4.06 and 4.15. This is because the proposed plan does not commit <br />to salvaging all topsoil and states that a plant community which <br />would provide less cover and production would better serve the end <br />land use. Such a plant community, however, would probably not <br />provide the same protection of the topsoil resource from wind and <br />water erosion as the native plant community did prior to <br />disturbance. <br />c. Biondini, et al. (1984) is stated as reporting that, "five years <br />after seeding, the composition of planted and volunteer shrubs on <br />the 30 cm topsoil depth averaged 138 compared to 5'L for the 60 cm <br />topsoil depth." This study used several introduced and native <br />shrubs in the seed mixtures, none of which were sagebrush. <br />Furthermore, only composition of these plots is cited. The <br />Division must consider vegetative composition, cover, and <br />production when determining whether a reveaetated area will meet <br />the requirements of Rule 4.15. In studies on the same plots by <br />Redente and Cook (1984), shrub production was directly, positively, <br />and significantly correlated to topsoil thickness over retorted oil <br />shale. Another paper describing a different aspect of this same <br />study by Biondini and Redente (1981) is cited (but not included in <br />the KCC bibliography) as stating that species diversity is <br />negatively correlated to topsoil thickness. Also, it is stated <br />that the authors concluded that applied fertilizer amount is <br />negatively correlated to species diversity. While this appears to <br />be the case, the authors also pointed out that low production, high <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.