Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />~~~ <br />t C. E. Johnston <br />Adequacy Review Response #2 <br />Page 2 <br />Page 3 of the renewal application will be revised to show <br />38 acres as the permitted disturbed acreage. <br />1.C. The maps that required the "Affected Area Permit <br />Boundary" be changed to the "Disturbed Boundary" have <br />been revised and transmitted separately. <br />2. No response required. <br />3. No response required. <br />IZI. HYDROLOGY <br />1. - 2. No response required. <br />3. Revised page 43 and new page 43a are enclosed. <br />4. - 8. No response required. <br />9. Exhibit A was revised as follows to clarify questions <br />regarding the water well, drill holes and discharge <br />points: <br />(1) A notation of reclaimed was added to the note water <br />well at elevation 6336. <br />(2) A notation of (U. S. Steel) was added near the note <br />drill hole at 6319. <br />(3) A notation of Outfall 002 was added near the note <br />discharge point at elevation 6319. <br />(4) A notation of Outfall 003 was added near the note <br />discharge point at elevation 6318. <br />(5) A notation of (U. S. Steel) was added near the not <br />drill hole at 6349. <br />10. - 16. No response required. <br />ZV. BOND ESTIMATE <br />1. - 3. No response required. <br />V. APPROXIMATE ORIGINAL CONTOUR <br />1. No response required. <br />