Laserfiche WebLink
~. <br />United States Department of the Interior <br />FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE <br />Ecological Services <br />764 HorizonDrive, Building B <br />Grand Junction, Colorado 81506-3946 <br />IN REPLY REFER TO: <br />ES-6-RO-06-F-GJSJ001 <br />MS 65412 GJ <br />Memorandum <br />To: <br />Fr ~ <br />. ti~ <br />Subject. <br />~6~~~~~~~ ~~ <br />March 3, 2006 ~ o <br />Natural Resource Specialist, Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation'and <br />Enforcement, Denver, Colorado <br />Western Colorado Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological <br />Junction, Colorado <br />Final Biological Opinion for National King Coal, LLC, King II Min< <br />035, Revision 8 <br />This is in response to your letter dated February 14, 2006, concerning Revision 8, to Permit C- <br />81-035, proposed by National King Coal, LLC, for the new King II coal mine in La Plata <br />• County, Colorado. The proposed mine is to be contiguous to the existing King Coal mine neaz <br />the town of Hesperus, Colorado, on State of Colorado lands and lands managed by the Bureau of <br />Land Management. The Service provides these comments under the authority of, and in <br />accordance with, the provisions of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended <br />(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (ESA), and the Interagency Cooperation Regulations (50 CFR 402). <br />Your letter includes effects determinations for the bald eagle, black-footed ferret, Canada lynx, <br />Colorado pikeminnow, Gunnison sage-grouse, Knowlton cactus, Mexican spotted owl, razorback <br />sucker, southwestern willow flycatcher, Uncompahgre fritillary butterfly, and yellow-billed <br />cuckoo. Regarding Federal candidates for official listing as threatened or endangered, these <br />species presently have no legal protection under the ESA, but it is within the spirit of the Act to <br />consider project impacts to these potentially sensitive species. We appreciate the consideration <br />you have given them in your evaluations. <br />Your analysis arrives at "no effect" determinations for the black-footed ferret, Canada lynx, <br />Gunnison sage-grouse, Knowlton cactus, Mexican spotted owl, southwestern willow flycatcher, <br />Uncompahgre fritillary butterfly, and yellow-billed cuckoo on the basis that the project azea and <br />neazby surroundings lack suitable habitat for these species. The Service concurs with your "no <br />effect" findings for these species. <br />The bald eagle received further evaluation; nesting sites are known in La Plata County, and <br />eagles aze common winter residents. However, you reported that baseline surveys of the <br />• proposed project azea and adjacent lands revealed a lack of suitable habitat for bald eagle <br />breeding or wintering. Since this species could potentially visit the project area at any time of <br />