Laserfiche WebLink
location at Yankee Gulch and once per year for the domestic well located off site <br />from Yankee Gulch. These level measurements would be made in conjunction <br />with the water quality sample collection. No production solution mines would be <br />in operation and no brine solution would be circulating in the wells or the <br />pipelines. All stand-by status production wells that are not plugged and <br />abandoned would be at ambient temperature and pressure with cast-iron bridge <br />plugs set. The constituent list would include the seventeen laboratory <br />parameters and four field measurements specified in the bottom portion of Table <br />3and4. <br />No water quality sampling will take place at well 20-4A in either the interim status <br />or commercial production monitoring plans. The well was a re-completed B <br />Groove monitoring well that shows elevated pH as a result of cement contact <br />through the perforation. Only water level data is of value at this point. Well 19-3 <br />was drilled to detect leakage from an evaporation pond that was never <br />constructed. The well has never had sufficient water to collect a sample. The <br />well will be checked for water level during each sampling event and if sufficient <br />water is present a sample will be collected. <br />Once commercial production operations resume, water levels will be monitored <br />continuously using water level probes at dissolution surface monitoring sites and <br />monthly with a manual measuring device at all other locations. Information <br />provided from the first five years of operation indicates that water level monitoring <br />is the best primary indicator of an influence from solution mining. Ground water <br />sampling would continue to take place on a quarterly frequency. The constituent <br />list in Table 4 summarizes the proposed commercial production monitoring <br />plan All proposed laboratory and field const~tuenls are the same for both the <br />interim status and commercial production time periods. The only difference <br />in these plans for ground water monitoring is the frequency stipulated for level <br />measurements. <br />The contingency in both interim status and commercial production monitoring <br />plans would be to increase the frequency of monitoring ~n the event that the data <br />indicates it is necessary to do so to evaluate an occurrence outside of Permit <br />Condition Values. Permit Condition Values would include established Numeric <br />Protective Standards for applicable point of compliance wells and Early blaming <br />Indicators for all other wells with the exception of up-gradient or control wells. <br />During interim status. a verification sample would be collected in the month <br />following the second quarterly sample containing one or more indicator <br />parameters that are outside of Permit Condition Values. <br />Once commercial production resumes, a verification sample would be <br />collected in the month following the first sample containing one or more indicator <br />parameters that are outside of Permit Condition Values. Notification would be <br />made to the Division of Minerals and Geology within 5 days of processing the <br />data reports from the lab for any constituents outside of the Permit Condition <br />