My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV91831
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV91831
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:20 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:15:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/2/1997
Doc Name
MID TERM PERMIT REVIEW NEW ELK MINE BASIN RESOURCES INC C-81-012
Type & Sequence
MT3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rules 2.08.3, 2.06.2, 2.06.3, 2.06.5 <br />2.06.7, and 3.02.2(4) <br />Mid-Term Review <br />New Elk Mine -Permit No. C-81-012 <br />This document presents the results of the Divisionof Minerals and Geology (Division) Mid-term <br />review of the New Elk Mine operated by Basin Resources, Inc. This review was conducted to <br />fulfill the requirements of Rules 2.08.3, 2.06.2, 2.06.3, 2.06.5, 2.06.7, and 3.02.2(4). <br />Rule 2.08.3 requires that the Division conduct a review of each permit issued, prior to its <br />Mid-term (2-1/2 years). Based on this review, for good cause shown, the Division may require <br />reasonable revisions or modifications of the permit provisions to ensure compliance with the Act <br />and Regulations. <br />Rules 2.06.2, 2.06.3, 2.06.5, and 2.06.7 require that experimental practices, mountain top <br />removal variances, variances from approximate original contour (AOC), and variances from <br />contemporaneousreclamation, respectively, be reviewed by the Division where applicable during <br />the Mid-term review. <br />Rule 3.02.2(4) requires that the Division review the amount of the bond and the terms of <br />acceptance of the bond every 2-1/2 years. <br />The Mid-term Review of the New Elk mine consisted of a review of the findings document, the <br />permit application and subsequent revisions, stipulations, enforcement actions, and other assorted <br />permit files and information. Also a complete reclamation cost liability analysis was conducted <br />and is included with this review. <br />The document is organized as follows: Section I contains a brief history of the mine. Section II <br />contains a summary of permit actions. Section III is a review of the stipulations attached to the <br />permit. Section N is a review of the enforcement actions issued since Permit Renewal #2 (RN- <br />02). Section V is a summary of the review and a discussion of any problems identified as a result <br />of this review which are required to be resolved. Section VI is a review of the Bond(s) and the <br />reclamation cost estimate. <br />-1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.