Laserfiche WebLink
MASSEY SEMENOFF STERN ~ SCSWARZ~ P.C. <br />Ms. Erica Crosby <br />March ] 3, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br />(d) DMG Adequacy Item No. 9, which pertains to the legal right of enter and mine <br />the so-called "Braly Property." <br />^ DMG Adequacy Item No. 2 -Man-Made Structures <br />Construction Materials Rule 6.4.19 requires a notarized agreement between the applicant <br />and the owner of any significant man-made structure confirming that the applicant will <br />compensate the structure owner for any damage that might result from the mining operation. <br />Alternatively, the applicant can provide the Division an engineering evaluation demonstrating <br />that the structure will not be damaged by the mining operation, Rule 6.4.19 only applies <br />"[w]here the mining operation will adversely affect the stability of significant, valuable or <br />permanent man-made structures located within two hundred (200) feet ojthe aJJected land ...." <br />' (Emphasis added) The term "affected land" is defined to include "the surface of an azea within <br />the state where a mining operation will be conducted, which surface is disturbed as a result of <br />such operation."Z <br />Attachment A to this response sets forth copies of letter agreements prepared by Western <br />Mobile and supplied to the owners of various significant, valuable or permanent man-made <br />structures located within 200 feet of the affected land. While Western Mobile belives that these <br />structures will not be adversely impacted, as contemplated in Rule 6.4.19, the agreements aze <br />provided nonetheless to address the Division's stated concerns s Fully executed copies of these <br />' letter agreements will be supplied to your office as soon as they aze returned to the applicant. <br />It should be noted that Attachment A does not include letter agreements related to <br />structures located on the affected land. For structures on the affected land, Construction <br />Materials Rule 6.4.3(g) requires that such structures be identified on the "Exhibit C" pre-mining <br />' and mining plan maps. This information is set forth in Exhibit B to the Hart Environmental <br />submittal as requested by the Division. <br />Please note that no letter agreements regarding structures owned by a Western Mobile <br />subsidiary company have been provided. This applies regazdless of whether there may be <br />Western Mobile owned structures either on or within 200 feet of the affected land. This is <br />because the Western Mobile companies aze wholly owned subsidiaries of Lafarge Corporation. <br />This therefore differs from the situation Rule 6.4.19 is calculated to address, whereby the <br />' Z It should be noted that the Adequacy Review No. 2 suggests that Rule 6.4.19 requvements apply to impacts <br />from both mining and reclamation. In point of fact, the standard is limited to impacts from the "mining operation" <br />The term "mining operation" is defined in Construction Materials Rule 1.1(27) to exclude reclamation. <br />a Letter agreements were supplied to Boulder County, Southdown, lnc., Poudre Valley REA, US West, the <br />Ciry of Longmont, and Public Service Company of Colorado. Copies of fowl executed ageements have been <br />returned by Poudre Valley RF.A and Public Service Company. These are set forth m Attachment A. As soon as the <br />remaining executed letter agreements become available, copies of the same will be sent to your attention. <br /> <br />