Laserfiche WebLink
L <br /> <br />~' <br /> <br />Jsrrvsr W. Bcew~RZ, Bep. <br />D~Recr Dw.: (303) 893-0999 <br />~MN~: juhwaa~denvafaw.com <br />MAS8EY 3EMEFOFF STERN ~ .S(.HWARZ~ P.C. <br />ATTORNEYS AT IAw <br />THE EQUITABLE BUILDING <br />730 SEVENTEENTH STREET, SUrfE 330 <br />DENVER, COLORADO 80202 <br />PHONE (303) 693-1815 <br />FACSIMILE (303)893-1829 <br />www. msstlenverlaw.com <br />Mazch ] 3, 2000 <br />' Ms. Erica Crosby <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Colorado Departrnent of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />1 Re: Western Mobile Boulder, Inc., ("Western Mobile") Permit No. M-74-015 <br />Lyons Pit Permit Amendment 006 <br />Response to Issues Raised in Adequacy Review No. 2 <br />t Deaz Ms. Crosby: <br />This letter and the enclosed attachments aze provided in response to the above referenced <br />1 Adequacy Review No. 2 prepazed by the Division of Minerals and Geology ("DMG" or <br />"Division"), dated January 10, 2000. Adequacy Review No. 2 pertains to Western Mobile's <br />proposed Amendment 006 to Permit No. M-74-015 for the so-called Lyons Pit, as prepazed by <br />Hart Environmental and submitted to the Division during the Summer of 1999. <br />Western Mobile has asked this firm to respond to discrete portions of Adequacy Review <br />1 No. 2. This letter should therefore be reviewed ;n conjunction with the response to Adequacy <br />Review No. 2 prepared and submitted to your office by Hart Environmental, also dated <br />March 3, 2000. The issues addressed in this response aze identified immediately below. <br />(a) DMG Adequacy Item No. 2, which pertains to impacts on man-made structures;) <br />,~ (b) Portions of DMG Adequacy Item No. 7, which pertain to post-mining land use; <br />(c) DMG Adequacy Item No. 8, which pertains to the legal right of enter and mine <br />property owned by Western Mobile subsidiary companies and property owned by <br />Southdown, Inc. and Frontier Materials, Inc.; and <br />~ It should be noted that Item No. 10 in Adequacy Review No. 2 restates the request regarding structures set <br />forth in Item No. 2. The response to Item No. 2 should be responsive to the Division's request in Item No. ] 0. <br /> <br />