My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV91228
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV91228
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:12:48 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:09:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/18/1999
Doc Name
FAX COVER
From
KELLY HAGLUND GARNSEY & KAHN
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR26
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,,''i1N-18-'1999 FRI 01:39 PM K/H/C & K LLC FAX N0. 3032938705 <br />• Michael Long <br />June 18, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br />P, 03 <br />Again, the failure to have adequate information on augmentation issues or <br />resolving such issues renders the ES inadequate, and the DMG approval of the <br />ES in light of such incompleteness is improper. Further, inasmuch ass the ES <br />was part of BMRI's TR-26 response, CCCD should have received the ES plan, <br />and an opportunity to comment thereon, pursuant to the Board's order of <br />January 26, 1999. DMG's failure to do constitutes a violation of the Board's <br />order. <br />C. Adequacy Letter Response to Comments of Rocky Mountain Consultants, <br />Inc., ("RMC") Comments on Monitoring Plan, Item 2.1 <br />The screening level risk assessment presented in Appendix D of TR~26 uses the <br />total recoverable form of iron to characterize aquatic risks (see Table 5 of TR-26 <br />Appendix D), and the total recoverable form of all metals, except iron and <br />• manganese, to characterize agricultural and drinking water risks (see Table 6 of <br />TR-26 Appendix D). For these reasons, RMC believes that surface water <br />samples should be analyzed for total recoverable metals as well as dissolved <br />metals. <br />RMC believes that it is premature to reduce the frequency of monitoring at <br />surface water station RS-5 from weekly to bi-weekly. Bi-weekly sampling, at a <br />minimum, is necessary until such time that Battle Mountain Resources, Inc. can <br />statistically demonstrate that the proposed remedial actions have ameliorated <br />water quality in the Rito Seco downstream of the mine site. <br />D. Adequacy Letter Response to RMC's "Specific" Comments <br />Page 18, Second Paragraph - <br />Mr. Posey states that background manganese concentrations at surface water <br />station RS-3 "should" be evaluated. Will they? <br />Page 20, Section 4.4,4.2 - <br />• The use of a physical barrier to inhibit the flow of water out of the West <br />PU901.061vro,nVlr OMG re ad"q~ccy.-p0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.