My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV90900
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV90900
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:12:32 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:07:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/16/1985
Doc Name
ECKMAN PARK MID-TERM REVIEW FN 79-177
From
MLRD
To
COLO YAMPA COAL CO
Type & Sequence
MT1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />! . <br />3. Rill and Gully Stabilization <br />CYCC is presently revising their rill and gully stabilization plan to <br />conform with •t he Division's recently revised policy. With respect to <br />stabilization of excessive rills and gullies, the plan will include <br />diversion of overland flow from eroded areas and methods for blocking and <br />treating gullies which retain sufficient topsoil for successful <br />revegetaion. Gullies which have cut down to overburden will be backfilled <br />and graded. The plan will specify appropriate time frames for completion <br />of the various remedial steps. With respect to permanent gullies, the <br />plan will specify areas of future reclamation where gully formation would <br />be expected to occur and will address management of those gullies. <br />The plan should be submitted as a technical revision to the application. <br />4. Bonding <br />The major issue outstanding with regard to the reclamation bond is the <br />appropriate bond amount for previously revegetated areas. Two options <br />were discussed: a) $200.00 per acre which is the revegetation portion of <br />the existing bond, and b) amore detailed cost figure based on age and <br />status of revegetated stands. In the latter case, 1 and 2 year old stands <br />would be bonded for the full cost of revegetation as would older stands <br />which have not met reference area standards for production and cover. <br />Stands which have met production and cover standards would be bonded at a <br />significantly reduced level. Stands meeting criteria for cover, <br />production, woody density, and diversity would be bonded at the lowest <br />level. <br />A revised bond calculation will be submitted by the permittee by <br />June 3, 1985. If the operator opts for option b described above, it will <br />be necessary to collect data this summer. In that event, bond <br />calculations submitted will exclude the previously revegetated areas. <br />Specific bonding levels for different stand conditions will be proposed. <br />The bond calculations should be submitted as a technical revision. <br />If you or Kent have any questions or are not in agreement with the above <br />summary, please call Bob Liddle or me. <br />Sincer ly, <br />~~ ~- ~- <br />Dan Mathews <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />DM/fw <br />Doc. No. 0490 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.