Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Richard Mills <br />Page 2 <br />March 13, 1998 <br /> <br />Twer:tymile Coa(Conrpany sla[es on page 2.06-l7(j)(6) [ha[ additional survey work will be <br />conducted. The Division can only assume TCC plans on submitting additional it forma!!on to <br />satisfy the reyuirerne»ts of Rule 1.06.8. I~r particular, the Division calls attenriorr to Rule <br />2.06.8(-1) and will expect that TCC wl!! submit irrformalion to adequately address each individual <br />section of this Ride. Rule 2.06.8(4)(a) requires the applicaliorr include detailed surveys and <br />baseline da[a and that it be cornple[e, concise and accurate. brcorporatingpas[ hydrologic, <br />geomorphic, mrd subsidence data generically by reference is not acceptable. While this darn is <br />en[irely slid jot use to assist in characterring the AVF, it needs to be presented in the context of <br />[he subsidence of Fish Creek. Cross-sections and Wraps of the ,9 VF should be sufficient in number <br />to characterize the entire por[ion of the AVF to be affected as well as the portions below which <br />rely on Fish Creek waters. Please review Rule 2.06.8(4)(c). One no[able omission a[ [his lime is <br />a plan for environmental monitoring required by 2.06.8(-J)(a)(vi) to measure compliance wi(h the <br />performance standards ojRule -1.24. Measurement of alluvia! wa[er level and quality at various <br />locations along the stream will be critical. Cross-sectiars, periodically surveyed, will a/so be <br />necessary. A program, similar in na[are but !urger in scope, to the irriua! program designed for <br />Fish Creek over Panels .i and 6 will be necessary. At this time, the information available is <br />irrsu~cier:[ for arty adequacy determination by the Division [o be made. <br />35. See response above to question #9..~3"L <br />36. Station 700 has been put on map 13A in the SW'/.SW'/< Section 13, T86W, RSN. Response is <br />adequate. ~C <br />41. See response above to question #32. - <br />43. Revised page 2.03-3.1, submitted March 31, 1998, is acceptable. Gt` <br />44.t) Revised page 2.03-3.1, submitted March 31, 1998, is acceptable. U l~ <br />g) Revised page 2.03-3.1, submitted March 31, 1998, is acceptable. U iC <br />46. Revised pages Exhibit 47, 22, 34, and 47, submitted April 6, 1998 are acceptable in establishing a <br />connection between Cyprus Mountain Coals, Buckhorn Processing Co., Lost Mountain Mining <br />Company, and Star Fire Mining Company. ~ ~ <br />47. Map I, Surface ownership was submitted on March 25, 1998, to show Andrew Hunter. Map 2 <br />was received April 1, 1998, correcting the coal ownership of portions of the S'h Section 2, T86W, <br />RSN. Revised page 2.03- I5.1 was received on March 25, 1998, adding the address for Mr. <br />Thompson and Mr. Gleason. This response is adequate. ~yi~ <br />AVS concerns identified in the Division's letter dated April 2, 1998 remain outstanding. Verification of <br />Mr. David J. Flemming's position title reasserts that either AVS needs to be updated or the proposed <br />revised pages need to be brought into agreement with the AVS information. (Item C. In the Division's <br />April 2, 1998 letter. <br />