Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />Denver, CU tlUG3l <br />Telephone 303/337-3877 <br />NCIG FINANCIAL, INC. Fax 303/337-1989 <br />October 12, 1991 <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division I~ C V ~' V <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />OCT 1 5 1991 <br />Attention: Larry P. Routten Mined Land <br />Sr. Reclamation Specialist ReClam8tl0nDiVISI0f1 <br />Re: Technical Revision No.,9~ <br />Coal ;R.idge No 1 Mine <br />Permit No. C-84-065 <br />Dear Mr. Routten: <br />Reference is made to your letter of October 9, 1991, regarding <br />the captioned subject. <br />Immediatedly upon reeipt of your letter, I contacted Mrs. Mildred <br />Alsdorf, County Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County regarding <br />your statement in the captioned letter that she informed you that <br />the "particular papers", which are the substance of TR-9, were <br />only placed in her office on October 1, 1991, and that this was <br />the first time she saw them. <br />Mrs. Alsdorf told me on October 11, 1991, that you apparently <br />misunderstood her when you made the call to which you refer in <br />your October 9, 1991, letter. The only "new" papers which were <br />received in her office on October 1, 1991, was a copy of the <br />transmittal letter from NCIG Financial, Inc. to the Division, <br />submitting the various replacement figures and maps, which were <br />the substance of TR-9. The replacement figures and maps were in <br />her offices but, as I indicated in my October 4, letter, had not <br />been inserted into the appropriate volumes of the permit. I per- <br />sonally did so on October 1. <br />While I stood with Mrs. Alsdorf at the front counter of the <br />County Clerk's office and discussed the matter of the "missing" <br />papers, one of the employees of the office came to the counter <br />with a set of papers, asking if these are the missing papers? <br />They were and I proceeded to insert them into the Volume I, <br />stamping each page with the day-stamp of October 1, 1991. <br />Unfortunately, these papers had not the day stamp of the day when <br />they were actually received. <br />M~II/~~I,r61 ~~„'ll <br />