My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV89380
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV89380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:11:18 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:50:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984065
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/13/1994
Doc Name
TR 10 COAL RIDGE 1 MINE
From
NCIG FINANCIAL INC
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• i • <br />For success comparison of the cropland it is suggested to <br />use the field immediatedly to the east, as that particular <br />field has been reworked and reseeded just prior to commencing <br />the reclamation work on the mine site. An identical seed mix <br />(Table 4.4-3a), excluding the Timothy grass component, which, <br />according to local farmers, will not grow in this area, has <br />been used on the off-site tract (appr. 23 acres). For the <br />success determination it is suggested to use bales per acre <br />(33 bales per ton), which is commonly used in local farming <br />operations. <br />As stated in the text, the Division will be notified of <br />the timing of any planned harvesting operation. Please note, <br />that, depending on weather conditions, harvesting, like this <br />year on off-site parcels, is being done on a 24 hour basis. <br />The same equipment would be used on both parcels and, <br />considering the size of the individual parcels, would be <br />harvested, most likely, within a 2 day span, if not on the <br />same day. <br />18) The off-site tipple area is outside the disturbed mine <br />site, but within the 5 year permit area. Its location to the <br />east of the disturbed area has been indicated on the <br />appropriate figure. <br />19) This subject has been discussed with previous reviewers. <br />The intake for the temporary irrigation system will be a minor <br />widening, and possibly a minor deepening, at one location of <br />Ditch #1. It is not a containment structure as water will <br />flow freely through it. it is not a pond, which would fall <br />under the regulations governing impoundments, but merely a <br />widening of the ditch by about 2 feet over a 4-5 foot section <br />of the ditch to allow pumping of water to uphill lands two or <br />three times per year. DMG suggested the term sump to clearly <br />indicate the purpose of the temporary intake. <br />20) a) Please see Section 4.4.2.3, pages 4-55 and 4-56, <br />which are still listed in the original version. Also see <br />Division of wildlife letter, which mentions the advantages of <br />terraces over slopes. Flat surfaces retain water longer, <br />allowing for time to soak into the ground and, since the water <br />is stationary, no erosion occurs. On slopes, water will run <br />downhill, only wetting the surface of the slopes. Erosion <br />will be considerable. The advantages of the terraces over the <br />slopes were recently quite obvious, as the considerable <br />rainfall during the past month was completely soaked up by the <br />ground on the terraces. In comparison on the one slope, the <br />accumulation of water on the lower part of the slope caused a <br />break, albeit a minor one, in the downhill ditchbank. <br />There is practically no gradient on the terraces except a <br />slight elevation on the down side, which will retard any run- <br />off from one terrace to the next lower one. <br />6'~~~~~al , i ~ p~~~, ,'ll <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.