My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV89313
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV89313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:11:15 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:50:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/1/1992
Doc Name
UNDERDRAIN FILTER REQUIREMENTS WEST PIT AND SECTION 16 PIT EXCESS SPOIL FILLS JOB 18638
From
CTL/THOMPSON INC
To
COLOWYO COAL CO
Type & Sequence
PR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> <br />~ Three particle size distribution curves were determined as shown on Figure 5. Curve <br />1 is generally unsorted spoil and consists of the following: <br />Cobbles and Boulders 50% <br />Gravel 28% <br />Sand 2% <br />~ Fines (- No. 200 sieve) 20% <br />Technically, according to filter design criteria the fines control, and require a fine sized <br />filter to prevent their movement. In a saturated flow situation some movement of the fines <br />could occur but we do not anticipate saturated conditions. The well graded matrix should <br />~ be stable and piping or loss of support is not expected. <br />Based upon the results of our observations and analyses, we recommend <br />construction of the spoil with lift thickness of at least 50 feet. Curve 3 (Figure 5) is the <br />drain rock. Curve 2 is sorted spoil from 8 to 13 feet above the base of a high lift spoil pile <br />(Photo 3). Curve 2 meets filter criteria for protection of the drain rock. By extrapolation, <br />~ as one moves progressively up the fill slope, the particle size curve will shift to the left as <br />particle size decreases. Each layer should provide filter criteria for the layer below. With <br />this procedure the unsorted spoil should be protected by a well developed filter section <br />which is created by gravity sorting of the spoil. <br />• <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />The results of our investigation and analyses indicate a filtering system is formed by <br />gravity sorting of spoil placed in thick lifts, and that construction of a separate filter <br />system should not be required. The gravity sorting which was consistently observed on <br />~ high lift spoil piles was evaluated and found to meet filter criteria for the underdrain. The <br />thickness of the filter layer observed in the test section is related to the lift height of 30 <br />feet, compared to a recommended minimum lift height of 50 feet. At higher lift heights, <br />a thicker filter layer will form. The high flow capacity of the drain and the permeable base <br />layer of each lift of the fill, low potential infiltration, experience with Streeter Fill, and <br />~ engineering judgment all indicate that construction of a filter system other than by gravity <br />sorting is not required. <br />To summarize, our analysis indicates that by utilizing the planned construction <br />procedures for the fills contamination of the underdrain will not occur as fill is placed and <br />a separate designed filter layer is not required. Furthermore, in our opinion the <br />~ construction techniques used at Colowyo will result in an adegate gravity sorted drain <br />without a specially placed drain. <br /> <br />5 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.