Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />3. Drain Caoacity <br /> <br />• <br />A particle size distribution for the drain rock was determined and is shown as Curve <br />3 on Figure 5. Using Leps methods (Section 4.2.1.3 of Reference 5) and the approximate <br />gradients in both the West Pit and Section 16 valleys, a flow capacity on the order of 70 <br />to 90 cubic feet per second (cfs) is estimated for the 8 x 24 foot trapezoidal drain section. <br />~ This is a considerable capacity in relation to any conceivable flow. In comparison, the <br />design surface runoff for the West Pit fill fora 100 year - 24 hour event is on the order of <br />60 cfs. No springs or seeps were noted within the valleys. Surface water infiltration is <br />the only source of water to the drain. Evaporation exceeds precipitation at this site and <br />infiltration is expected to be very low. We estimate the capacity of the drain is vastly over <br />built and is at least 10 times the maximum conceivable flow. The presence of a very <br />~ permeable, large diameter highly sorted layer which will form along the entire base of the <br />lift will by itself provide sufficient capacity to drain the fill as evidenced by Streeter Fill. <br />The permeability of the spoil materials was also evaluated. We estimate the <br />permeability of the unsorted, "top of lift" materials to be on the order of 10'' to 10"Z ft(day. <br />The lower, sorted spoil and drain rock section are estimated to have similar permeabilities <br />• on the order of 105 to 106 ft/day. Observations at the Streeter Fill at the Colowyo Mine <br />have shown no development of free water within the spoil over the 15 year life of this <br />spoil (even without a specially placed drain). The proposed spoil piles will have sufficient <br />permeability to pass any infiltration water without developing saturated conditions. <br />~ 4. Filter Criteria <br />Rule 4.09.2 (2)(c) requires the filter system "shall be designed and constructed using <br />standard geotechnical engineering methods". Filter criteria which can be considered <br />"standard geotechnical engineering methods" were developed for high gradient seepage <br />flows within embankment dams where saturated flow occurs. The low gradient seepage, <br />• lack of saturated conditions, and very large diameter drain rock involved in this project <br />require that engineering judgement be applied to the implementation of these criteria for <br />these conditions. The flow conditions within the unsaturated spoil will not develop <br />seepage forces sufficient to pipe materials into the drain. Therefore, based on standard <br />geotechnical methods no filter is necessary. <br />• Filter design criteria require that the D15 of the filter be 4 to 9 times or more smaller <br />than the DBS of the base (or soil to be protected). This ratio depends on the type of soil, <br />with 4 for coarse, clean soils and 9 for very clayey soils. Details of the procedure are <br />spelled out in Reference 4. To provide adequate permeability D15 of the filter should be <br />five times greater than D15 of the base. Other factors to be considered are permeability, <br />• flow capacity, thickness and cost. <br />• <br />[] <br />