My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV89211
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV89211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:11:09 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:49:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983039
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/12/1997
Doc Name
AIRPORT GRAVEL PIT PN M-83-039 ADEQUACY REVIEW OF CONVERSION APPLICATION
From
DMG
To
LAS ANIMAS CNTY
Type & Sequence
CN2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
h' <br /> <br />of Section 20 which also adjoins, at the corner, the NW 1/4 NW <br />1/4 of Section 21. There is no listing of an owner for the SE <br />1/4 SE 1/4 of Section 17 which also adjoins, at the corner, <br />the NW 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 21. Charles D. Latuda appears to <br />be inaccurately indicated on the map to own the S 1/2 SW 1/4 <br />of Section 16 when the listing says that "French Trinidad Co. <br />LLC" owns the entire W 1/2 of Section 16 as well as the W 1/2 <br />E 1/2 of Section 16. The Airport Gravel Pit is also believed <br />to partially lie within the NE 1/4 NW 1;4 of Section 21. <br />6~ There is, however, no listing of ownership for the adjoining <br />NW 1/4 NE 1/4, SW 1/4 NE 1/4 and the SE 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section <br />21. <br />A revised Exhibit C map should be submitted, possibly toger_her <br />with a more complete listing of surface owners immediately <br />adjacent to the land to be affected by the mining, in order to <br />clearly meet the requirements of this Exhibit and to ensure <br />that all adjacent property owners are properly recognized and <br />notified. (See the requirements of Rule 1.6.2 (1) (e).) The <br />questions raised about the County's ownership of the NW 1;4 Nw <br />1/4 of Section 21 and if this ownership also includes the NE <br />1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 21 should be addressed specifically. <br />EXHIBIT C: The location of the NS trending fence in the ~~ <br />western part of the proposed permit area is not shown on the ~ <br />v~" map nor is the ownership, ie. reportedly the County, <br />indicated. <br />The revised Exhibit C map should also include this <br />information. <br />EXHIBIT D: The nature, depth and thickness of the deposit toel~ <br />be mined and the thickness and type of overburden to be <br />removed has not been provided. The nature. of the stratum <br />immediately underlying the material to be mined has not been <br />provided. <br />A revised Exhibit D narrative should be sup_o_lied which <br />includes the above information. <br />EXHIBIT E: The reclamation plan does not include describing or <br />illustrating where salvaged topsoil will be stockpiled in the <br />~ permit area until needed for the reclamation nor does it v~ <br />include a commitment to stabilize such stockpile(s) with <br />vegetation in order to protect the resource from erosion. If <br />there are stockpiles of overburden apart from topsoil, these <br />must be mentioned and/or illustrated as well. <br />A revised or amended Exhibit E and Exhibit F Map should be <br />supplied which include the above information. <br />EXHIBIT F-MAP: The maps provided do not really illustrate the <br />~ expected physical appearance of the area of the affected land `~~ <br />following reclamation, ie. post-mining topography, direction <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.