My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV89022
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV89022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:11:01 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:47:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1987164
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/27/2000
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION CONSIDERATION
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i- <br />• i <br />DEPARTMENT OFTHE ARMY <br />U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO <br />CORPS OF ENGINEERS <br />7325 J STREET <br />~.Yto SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 958142922 <br />•rn<xnoxos July 17, 2000 <br />Regulatory Branch (200075063) <br />Mr. Edward Camilletti <br />Camilletti and Sons, Incorporated <br />HC 66 Box 45 <br />Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80487 <br />Dear Mr. Camilletti: <br />. ~ ~._~..:....:.C.3~ <br />CN-o~ <br />RECEIVED <br />JUL 18 2"^-J <br />Division o/ Miner_!: and Gealop~ <br />I.am responding to your written requests, submitted by IME, <br />for both a verification of wetland mapping and a determination of <br />permit needs for your proposed large scale mine operation near <br />Milner. The 71-acre site is located south of Milner between <br />Trout Creek and the Yampa River immediately downstream (west) of <br />the Routt County Road 179 bridge. The legal description is <br />defined as the SE lj4 of Section 15, Township 6 North, Range 86 <br />bleat, Routt County, Colorado. <br />Haled on a site inspection by Susan Bachini Nall of this <br />office on May 31, 2000, we determined that your wetland boundary <br />delineation is accurate with minor revisions. Those revisions <br />were made in the field during the site inspection. One area of <br />question was the mapping of ordinary high water (OHW) mark of the <br />Yampa River at the northwestern corner of the property. During <br />the site inspection, river flows were high and the channel was <br />flowing well outside the map marked channel. Few wetland plants <br />were observed (as they were underwater and we are unable to <br />ascertain which submitted photographs depict this area) and this, <br />along with the wetted perimeter, depth and velocity of water, and <br />the accumulation of debris, made the detez<nir_ation of OHW mask <br />difficult. A subsequent visit to this area confirms the mapped <br />OHW mark; yet, observations of normal high water should not be <br />discounted. The a tual location of river flows during normal <br />high water are very important when considering the necessary <br />setbacks and the long term management for this property. <br />The plan referenced below is an accurate depiction of the <br />limits of Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean <br />Water Act. The plan is labeled: <br />Camilletti Milner Pit No. 2 <br />Wetland Map <br />Revised June 19, 2000 <br />I~ <br /> <br />MCNURE <br />This verification is valid for a period of five years from <br />the date of this letter and is based on information supplied by <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.