My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV88718
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV88718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:10:48 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:44:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/18/1994
Doc Name
TR 67 WEST ELK MINE PN C-80-007 ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
DMG
To
CHRISTINE JOHNSTON
Type & Sequence
TR67
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ii~ iiiiiii~niiiiii~ <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl of Na(ural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (30.31 866-35ti7 <br />FAX: 13031832-8106 <br />Date: April 18, 1994 <br />To: Christine Johnston <br />From: Steve Shuey~ss <br />Re: West Elk Mine, Permit No. C-80-007 <br />TR-67 Adequacy Review <br />I~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Rov Romer <br />Guvemrrt <br />ken Salazar <br />E~cunive DueUO! <br />nLChar•I B. LwrB <br />Division Diredur <br />I have reviewed MCC's responses to the vegetation, soils and wildlife concerns regarding the <br />TR-67 application. I have listed my responses below in the order that the original adequacy <br />comments were numbered. <br />1. If any areas that are to be disturbed have not been surveyed for Grand Mesa Penstemon, as <br />requested by BLM, USFWS and DMG lin past and/or current MCC permitting actions), then <br />a thorough survey of these areas should be conducted. In many cases, once a species is <br />listed as Threatened or Endangered lT&E), it is too late to save the species. When a species <br />reaches the critical stage where it is considered a candidate for the T&E list, it is most <br />important to begin careful and thorough survey, inventory and management processes to <br />protect the species. <br />2. MCC should either settle on a definite plan of how the light use road section will be <br />reclaimed (reclaimed or converted to a ditch) and provide details of the reclamation or <br />conversion process, or they should give us details for both plans so we can review and issue <br />a decision on both plans. The Division requested, in the preliminary adequacy review, <br />details for the light use road reclamation. MCC responded with generalities. Please have <br />MCC specify whether the road will be reclaimed as per approved reclamation procedures for <br />disturbed areas as described in their permit. If not, they must give specifics including, but <br />not limited to, topsoil depth, ripping depth, mulch and seed application processes and rates, <br />seed mix, fertilizer types and amounts. <br />3. If MCC plans to use the cleared shrub material for any purpose, rather than dispose of it, <br />specific details of their plans should be submitted to the Division for review. <br />4. Response acceptable. <br />5. As stated in the preliminary adequacy review, MCC should not begin topsoil salvage <br />procedures for the construction of storage bench until soil moisture is below 75 percent of <br />field capacity, unless they can demonstrate that the topsoil can be handled at a higher <br />percentage of moisture content without significant compaction or soil degradation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.