My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV88256
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV88256
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:10:27 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:41:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978052
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/3/1990
Doc Name
COMMENTS ON ADEQUACY REVIEW HOWE PIT AMENDMENT FN M-78-052
From
TUTTLE APPLEGATE INC
To
MOBILE PREMIX
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-- <br />TUTTLE APPLEGATE, INC. <br />Consultants for Land and Resource Development <br />John Hickman <br />Mobile Premix <br />August 3, 1990 <br />Page 2 <br />The First Creek channel and Bull Seep relocation could be <br />moved to the east 200 feet as requested with no technical <br />impact to the channel or river system. <br />11. The report should have stated that there would be two lakes <br />created by the mining. <br />If the existing lake is not used for recharge, the cone of <br />depression would change, however, the impact should not be <br />too significant in terms of the number of additional well <br />owners that would be affected. The eastern boundary of the <br />cone would be more uniform than originally calculated. <br />There would be no increase in the impact to the north, south <br />or west. A copy of the revised groundwater map is enclosed <br />which shows the revised estimate of the impact zone. <br />12. The volume of groundwater entering the pit is estimated <br />based on field observations of other dewatering operations <br />along the South Platte River in the immediate vicinity. The <br />range given accounts for some variability in the amount of <br />pit being dewatered, the time of year, the river stage, etc. <br />which can affect the amount of inflow. <br />The values for permeabilities in the area can be found in <br />Table 1 of the report on groundwater impacts. <br />13. If additional wells are impacted, they would be handled in <br />the same manner as all wells in the vicinity. All data <br />collected would be submitted in the annual report as <br />requested. <br />14. A considerable portion of the work involved in constructing <br />these structures will be handled in the earth moving costs <br />that are covered in other parts of the bond. The major pay <br />items that would be involved would be some minor additional <br />excavation, rock riprap and filter blankets and concrete. <br />The following costs for the hydraulic structures are <br />proposed as part of the reclamation costs: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.