My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV88216
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV88216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:10:26 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:40:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/18/1991
Doc Name
APPLICATION FORM FOR A REVISION TO A COAL MINING AND RECLAMATION PERMIT
Type & Sequence
MR74
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />C c~rp~tus <br />s~ Ya,~pavauey <br />Cyprus Yampa Valley Caal Corporation <br />29587 Routt County Road #27 <br />Oak Creek, Colorado 80467 <br />303-879-3800 <br />December 6, 1991 <br />Tony Waldron <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203-2273 <br />Dear Mr. Waldron: <br />~~ <br />~~~ <br />~ ~~®~'~ <br />6~ ~a ,~~ <br />~~~ ~~, a`g'o. <br />.,,pct` <br />Re: Midterm Review Response lf2: Mines 1.2. & Eckman Park: Permit C-81-071 <br />In response to Mr. Berry's letter of 2 August, CYCC is submitting the enclosed information. <br />Fach Division concern is followed immediately by CYCC's response. <br />MLRD CONCERN: <br />1. The responses pertaining to the various permit stipulations aze adequate, with one <br />exception, as discussed below. We will retain the existing stipulations until Permit C-81- <br />071 is renewed. At that time, outdated stipulations will be removed. <br />CYCC Response: <br />No response necessary. <br />MLRD CONCERN: <br />2. We do not completely understand the response to Stipulation 20. It appears that the E'h <br />W'f~ Section 25, Township 5 North, Range 87 West has been added to the current <br />boundary shown on Permit Renewal map No. 1. Also, reference is made to a <br />forthcoming incidental boundary change technical revision. Please provide clarification <br />regazding CYCC's intentions. Please also note that if changes aze proposed, and <br />described in the midterm response, the changes cannot be approved via the midterm <br />process. Finally, revised Permit Renewal Maps 1, 2, and 5 were submitted with <br />Technical Revision 28. Based on our agreement referenced in the CYCC midterm <br />response. Stipulation 20 is considered satisfied. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.