Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />i 245 <br /> 1 the spillway, which I believe Rob addressed in terms <br /> 2 of the final design of the spillway, so that it will <br />' 3 i <br />i <br /> not requ <br />re ma <br />ntenance. <br />' 4 There was a concern about no monitoring. <br /> 5 The bond calculations include monitoring of every <br />' 6 site for five years after the mining project ::s <br /> 7 completed. Those calculations are in the <br />t 8 reclamation bond. <br /> 9 So we believe that the bond is <br />1 10 fi <br />i <br /> suf <br />c <br />ently conservative. <br /> 11 MR. MASSEY: Any questions? <br /> 12 I would like to round out my time very <br /> 13 quickly with two quick responses. <br /> 14 One, Phil Hooker suggested this mo:cning <br /> 15 that there was a major visual impact. I think the <br /> 16 Board is well aware that this impact is not <br /> 17 thi <br />i <br />i <br /> some <br />ng wh <br />ch <br />t has authority under its <br /> 18 regulations to deal with. <br /> 19 I d0 want the record to reflect that we <br /> 20 had a discussion with the Division about that issue <br /> 21 and out of that discussion agreed to change the <br /> 22 nature of the material that was going to go on the <br /> 23 face, on the reclamation spillway, from a cemen•~ <br /> 24 t <br />t <br /> s <br />ruc <br />ure to a grouted riprap, in order that it <br /> 25 would blend in better from a color and form <br />AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br />L <br />