Laserfiche WebLink
235 <br /> 1 d <br />f <br />fid <br />h <br />i <br />i <br />i <br /> egree o <br />con <br />ence t <br />at these fac <br />l <br />t <br />es are <br />' 2 stable on the 6eismic conditions. <br /> 3 (Inaudible.) <br />' 4 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: I can do that. <br /> 5 MR. MASSEY: Another question was raised <br /> 6 this morning concerning the curbing in the mi.Ll and <br /> 7 the potential for failure of the curbing in the <br />' 8 ill <br /> m <br />. <br />' 9 I think the solution -- resolution <br /> to of that question might lie in the greatest <br />' 11 configuration of the facility (inaudible). <br /> 12 MR. DOREY: If I can. Obviously, there <br />' 13 are other peogle here that know more about it, but <br /> 14 I am sitting here, I suppose. <br /> 15 The <br />d <br />ithi <br />th <br />ill t <br />i <br /> re are <br />es <br />gns w <br />n <br />e m <br />o <br />' 16 provide containment for a leakage potential from the <br /> 17 tanks themselves. These are steel tanks. The;f are <br />' 18 not under pressure. <br /> 19 When you talk of rupture, we are not <br />' 20 talking about a pressurized tank which will riFr <br /> 21 apart and allow total discharge of its contentsc <br />' 22 ithi <br /> w <br />n a short geriod of time. The containment. <br />' 23 capacity is such that, in terms of the design <br /> 24 criteria, it can be controlled within that curbing. <br /> 25 If there was the very low probability <br />' AGREN, BLANDO 5 BILLINGS <br /> <br />