My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-11-15_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1990-11-15_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 12:54:08 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:39:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/15/1990
Doc Name
REPORTS TRANSCRIPT OF PUBLIC HEARING VOLUME I APPLICATION OF BATTLE MENT PART 2
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />r <br /> <br /> <br />II <br />.~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />L~ <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />zlo <br />1 We don't know what the rebuttal people <br />2 are going to say and I don't know if we are going to <br />3 have time to cross-examine them afterward. If there <br />4 are 11 witnesses (inaudible). <br />5 THE CHAIRMAN: The procedure calls for <br />6 you to make your cross-examination at this point and <br />7 I think -- <br />8 MR. COHEN: We are going to be crossing <br />9 witnesses that haven't come up. <br />10 THE CHAIRMAN: I don't think they will <br />11 be witnesses. I think they are going to be people <br />12 who provide rebuttal or a closing statement, which <br />13 isn't subject to cross-examination. <br />14 MR. COHEN: I think the rebuttal -- my <br />15 understanding of what Battle Mountain intends 'to do <br />16 now is put on rebuttal witnesses, other experts that <br />17 they have retained and brought here. Those are the <br />18 people that are probably going to be appropriate <br />19 people to respond to the questions that we want. to <br />20 ask. <br />21 And it just seems to me, at least it <br />22 would be more appropriate to ask those people rather <br />23 than people who won't know the answers to the <br />24 questions or who will have to be -- we are going to <br />25 be asking questions of people who haven't even given <br />AGREN, BLANDO 5 BILLINGS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.