Laserfiche WebLink
1 160 <br /> 1 but in other areas this has been found to be wholly <br /> ' <br /> 2 inadequate. And I <br />m wondering when we will see some <br />' 3 plans for a filter plant to filter out these heavy <br /> 4 chemicals that are so destructive, not only to <br /> 5 humans but to the wildlife. <br /> 6 This, to me, is a very hazardous <br /> 7 it <br />ti <br />A <br />d d <br />b <br />d <br />h <br />ti <br />? <br /> s <br />ua <br />on. <br />n <br />oes any <br />o <br />y <br />ave any ques <br />ons <br /> 8 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Yes. <br /> 9 SISTER CLARA MANHART: Yes? <br />t 10 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: You've mentioned <br /> 11 a number of concerns. Do you -- do you think that <br /> 12 the operations under the amendment, as proposed -- <br />' 13 do you think those operations would be more serious <br /> 14 to, say, wildlife and to the heavy metals and the <br /> 15 dust and all that sort of thing -- do you think that <br /> 16 would be worse under the amendment operations or the <br /> 17 way it is now? <br /> 18 SISTER CLARA MANHART: Well, in a way it <br /> i <br /> 19 would be more, because talking about barbed w <br />re <br /> 20 fence, that is worse than a hog fence, and even hog <br /> 21 fence is not adequate for wildlife, aside from the <br /> 22 fowl that very often mistake your leaching pond for <br /> 23 a lake, and they even change their direction of <br /> 24 thei <br />i <br />t <br />th <br />th <br />d <br />h t <br />t <br />i <br /> r <br />ps nor <br />r <br />ese areas <br />an <br />sout <br />o s <br />op <br />n <br />' 25 because they see the great lakes. <br />AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br /> <br />