My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-10-19_REVISION - M1995035
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1995035
>
2006-10-19_REVISION - M1995035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2024 5:06:00 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:30:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1995035
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/19/2006
Doc Name
Response to Inspection report dated March 28 2006
From
Applegate Group Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Erica Crosby. <br />RE: Connell Resources, Inc. Wellington Downs Pit Technical Revision -_ <br />October 13, 2006 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />The State Pit site is located north of the- Wellington Downs site and Weitzel Pit groundwater ' <br />lakes. A small portion of the State Pit site (approximately 3. acres) was reclaimed in -2005 and <br />eazly 2006 with abelow-grade clay liner and additional backfill material. During the 2005 and <br />eazly 2006 reclamation activities, pit dewatering flows from the State Pit were discharged, with <br />landowner permission, into the southeast groundwater lake on the Weitzel Pit site. <br />Local groundwater conditions at the three sites (State, Weitzel, and Wellington Downs) suggest <br />a flow. generally from the northwest to the southeast. Available published information (United <br />States Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas 746B) suggests the groundwater <br />gradient across the site is approximately 0.003 (0.3 feet decline per 100 feet of horizontal <br />distance) from. northwest to southeast. The hydraulic conductivity for the aquifer was also <br />estimated from local, published pump-test data (Colorado Water Conservation Board Ground- <br />water Circular 11). Using the available data, estimated bulk hydraulic conductivity for the <br />alluvium is between 170 feeUday and 330 feetlday. This value is within the range of published <br />hydraulic conductivity values for unconsolidated clean to silty sands and gravels. In addition, <br />although specific measurements aze not available, published estimates of porosity for the alluvial <br />material in the saturated thickness (sand and gravel) range from 20 to 30 percent. <br />According to observations during mining, the saturated thickness of the alluvial aquifer is <br />generally less than 10 feet and varies with season. The normal water table ranges from 4 to <br />6 feet below the ground surface, but also varies with season. These observations aze consistent <br />with available .published information (United States Geological Survey Hydrologic <br />Investigations Atlas 746B). <br />The information collected suggests an alluvial groundwater system that has a relatively low <br />gradient and high transmissivity and porosity. Although specific modeling was not performed <br />for the groundwater conditions in this azea, Applegate Group, Inc. has been involved with <br />several modeling, investigations for mining and below-grade reservoir projects in the Cache la <br />Poudre River and South Platte River basins. These projects occurred in alluvial aquifer systems <br />with similaz groundwater conditions. Results have indicated that groundwater mounding and <br />shadowing is greatest immediately adjacent to azeas with sealed pits or compacted backfill. <br />Modeling has predicted mounding and shadowing around isolated sealed pits creating <br />approximately 2-foot differences in baseline groundwater table elevations, with~the affects <br />decreasing'rapidly with distance from the backfill. <br />Based on the site conditions and modeling results from similaz projects, it is not likely that the <br />liners and additional backfill used for reclamation of the mining sites will negatively affect the <br />sites or adjacent property owners. Potential increases in the groundwater table from mounding <br />affects would not likely expose groundwater at the normal ground level due to the estimated <br />baseline groundwater depth below the surface. Additionally, potential increases in water levels <br />of the Weitzel Pit groundwater lakes would most likely be temporary and seasonal and not likely <br />be distinguishable from normal seasonal fluctuations. <br />During the' Mazch 28, 2006 Division site inspection, water was observed flowing from the <br />southeast Weitzel Pit groundwater lake, over a low point in its southern bank, and onto the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.