Laserfiche WebLink
PM DOUG CONGER <br />970 565 BS96 P. 01 <br />fl$OLOflICALSB1i;Y1CiES - iPH(Tf0A1i~1t (8701588-ease <br />DbwrrssL fxastseB, Batato~57' vtvrs g <br />711 fl/tftTllltLY Rt1AD, t;OR787„ OOLORADO 818131 rpr .~ri <br />measBpat-a7 <br />July 12, 2002 <br />Division of Minerals & Geology <br />1313 Sherman Stract, Rvom 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Subject: Sluvano (travel, Permit File M 1983-208 <br />Amendment 1 Application CommentslLxtension <br />Dear Mr. Shuey: <br />After carefltl dclibcration Montrose County P,ngineer Deparirnent has decided to change liLL <br />reclamation gval for this permitted site in this amendment application. Considet'atinns of the <br />immediate and long~tertn use of the County-owned Shavana Mesa property dictate that. <br />following the gravel mining use of this propeRy, the premises ere to ba used es an industrial <br />yurdnite fin ongoing County tnaintetwnee, storage and other yard site uses. To Ihat slut, <br />reclemalinn at the site shall be the leveling, grading and compacting of the surface. Much of the <br />surface will consist of 11at-graded residual products or placed gravel and ph run grnvclly <br />materinl. Other portions tray be just the compacted sails or wnsolldated rock from beneath the <br />extractc~l gravelly resource material. Shaped elopcbanks sod the termed/daylighlcd crests. <br />where they occur, shall be topsoiled and revegetated. <br />To accommodate. these changes in the cut'tcnt application, County of Montrose is requesting the <br />re-start ofthe eot8ideration time for this application so that the advertising, county board & SCD <br />notices. mailed notices, and application revisions maybe accomplished, as required. <br />Bcbw are our cotnmcnla on the adequacy Lrsaes from your correspondence of 5 April 2002. <br />1) Uwttcrs of structures within 200 feet of thn southwest alternate access area have been <br />identified, both on the revised application "Fathibit C" 'Mining Plan Map' and within the <br />revised description of struelures of "F,xhibil S". Copies of applicable damage <br />rwiarbarsermnr agreements are included. <br />Z) The entire mining area has been labeled on the "Exhibit C" 'Mining Plan Mup'. <br />3) The apparetri discrepancy in mining boundary contours in the soothes.+t extraction area have <br />been trtudificA on the "Exhibit C" 'Mining Pian Map'. <br />4) Structures and their owners within 200 feet of the southwest ahernate access area have been <br />identified, Iwth on the t~;vised application `'Exhibit C Mining Plan Map", and within the <br />revised application "Exhibit S" description of structures, Copies of applicable damage <br />nlmbarsrrranf agneenrentr are ineludad. <br />5) According to the information we have been able to confum with Colorado Department of <br />I~uhlic llenlth and Enuonment, the third paragraph of the "Exhibit D" 'Mining Plun' Is <br />accurota in asserting that "...No acid, eerie, oar hararduus waste pruduets .thall be involved <br />in the nropasad action." Product'wn and storage of asphaltic concrete "mix" is ant <br />considered by the Air Pollution Control Division nor Fta~erdous Waste Division to trc <br /> <br />