My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-03-31_REVISION - M1977344 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977344
>
2003-03-31_REVISION - M1977344 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:55:54 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:36:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977344
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/31/2003
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Review
From
Holcim
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The pre-mined land has a relatively low grazing value due to the poor soil conditions, dry climate, <br />and the generally steep terrain. The pre-mining topography depicted in the C-2 Mining Plan Map is <br />that of an erosional, arid landscape. As indicated by Exhibit F, Figure F-1 Reclamation Plan, post- <br />mining regrading of the formerly rocky and inaccessible steep cliff areas will result in a final <br />topography more suitable for grazing, In addition, the planting of native grasses should improve the <br />available forage for grazing. <br />Materials Handling <br />As discussed in the Mining Plan, Exhibit D, the mining cuts will be backfilled with overburden <br />material as shipping and mining of subsequent cuts proceeds. The overburden material will be <br />removed from the new mining cuts using a Liebherr 994 hydraulic shovel and Caterpillar 992G (or <br />D) front-end loaders, and loaded into Caterpillar 785D haul trucks. The haul trucks will then <br />transport the material directly to a previously mined cut, and the overburden material will be initially <br />dumped and left at the natural angle of respose, which is approximately 1.3:1 (H:V). As the <br />back811ing operations continue, the backfilled zone will progress across the previously mined cut. <br />When necessary, the backfilled material will be regraded/shaped to achieve slopes no steeper than <br />3:1, as indicated on Figure F-1, Reclamation Plan Map. <br />The haul truck activity (each weighs more than 100 tons empty} will crush the shaley overburden <br />material, creating a layer of fine-grained material on the surface. The heavy truck traffic will also <br />help compact and expedite the settlement of the backfill material. The upper surface of the backfill <br />area will be rough-graded using a Caterpillar 16H grader. Care will continue to be taken to <br />continually grade the temporary haul roads to minimize the wear-and-teaz on the mining equipment <br />and for safety reasons. As settlement of the backfill occurs, the final surface will be regraded to <br />prevent ponding of storm water on the surface. The majority of the affected area will be graded to <br />approximately 1-2% slopes to allow runoff while minimizing erosion (see Figure F-1, Reclamation <br />Plan Map). <br />Water Resources <br />The mining of the Bear Creek watershed south of state Highway 50 will impact the current <br />hydrologic conditions in the lower reaches of Bear Creek. Through at least 2002 and continuing to <br />the present, regional drought conditions have eliminated the flow of surface water in the upper <br />portion of Bear Creek down to and somewhat below the double concrete box culvert under Highway <br />50. in the lower section of the creek further downstream of the culvert, however, Beaz Creek <br />becomes a gaining stream. In October 2002, a site inspection indicated no flow was observed at the <br />culvert under Highway 50, while a flow of less than 0.5 CFS was observed at the Highway 120 <br />crossing neaz the mouth of Bear Creek as it approaches the Arkansas River. <br />Prior to the onset of drought conditions in 2001, Holcim had originally planned to establish wetlands <br />along the planned realignment of Bear Creek, which was originally to be diverted to the west- <br />southwest around the area to be mined. This was the original basis for the initia1404 Permit with the <br />U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. With the elimination of flow in upper Bear Creek, however, it was <br />concluded that this wetlands mitigation plan was no longer viable, and the 404 Permit with the Corps <br />of Engineers was modified in late 2002 to rely upon the establishment of supplemental wetlands at <br />the Transit aggregate operation located at the mouth of Hardscrabble Creek along the Arkansas <br />River. <br />Exhibit E - revised.doc <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.