My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-01-31_REVISION - M1986015 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1986015
>
2007-01-31_REVISION - M1986015 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:42:30 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:25:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/31/2007
Doc Name
Amendment
From
Continental Materials Corporation
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
altered. Approval of whateverchanges are necessary will be sought if this dredge approach or another <br />significant change in method is implemented. <br />SPECIFIC METHODS: <br />Requirement: Aggregates will be removed from the deposit by front-end loader and will be <br />transported directly to the processing plant via conveyor. No specific conveyor routes are shown on <br />the mining plan map because these will frequently change as the deposit is mined. <br />DISCUSSION: Extraction of the aggregate, of course, will only occur where the topsoil and <br />overburden has been previously removed. Mining aggregate prior to such removal would not only waste <br />the soil and overburden resource, but would necessarily create a severe contamination of the final product <br />and render washing far more difficult. <br />Requirement: Pit slopes in Phase 1 will be left in a near vertical condition because Phase I will be <br />backfilled. <br />DISCUSSION: In Phase 1, because the area will be backfilled, pi[ edge slopes are no[ critical. <br />In general, these are mined to be vertical or nearly so. There is always some sloughing of the wall which <br />produces a small "berm" at the base of the wall. These walls are usually amazingly secure. Large scale <br />collapse of the wall is rare. <br />Requirement: Pit slopes inside [he groundwater barrier wall in Phase 2 will be mined to a grade <br />not steeper than 3:1. If a steel wall rather than a slurry wall is installed and fill is available that will <br />not adversely affect the reclamation of Phase 1, then constructing part or all of the slopes with <br />backfill is acceptable. However, under no circumstances may [he steel wall itself be exposed directly <br />by mining or through sloughing of the mined face. <br />DISCUSS N: Phas~equires a completely different approach to the edges of the pit <br />adjacent to the oundwater barner wall. Because of the groundwater barrier wall the edge of the pit must ( <br />be carefully med [o maintain maximum stability of [he slope. Therefore, the pi[ edge will be mined to a <br />slope of 3:1 as a minimum. Thus, native material will form the pit slope rather than creating the final <br />slope using backfllling. Backfilled slopes, in these situations, are not as stable as native material, <br />especially before water is placed in [he closed basin. Severe thunderstorms as well as possible flood <br />overflows can quickly erode backfilled slopes unless they are constructed with considerable compaction. <br />Overflow can cause headward erosion that can quickly cut back into a slurry wall, if that choice is <br />Pueblo East Pit Amendment 3 (2007) Exhibit D Page 31 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.