My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-01-31_REVISION - M1986015 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1986015
>
2007-01-31_REVISION - M1986015 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:42:30 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:25:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/31/2007
Doc Name
Amendment
From
Continental Materials Corporation
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
bottom of the topsoil layer and the gravel layer is considered overburden, even though i[ may also be <br />considered subsoil. <br />On [his site overburden does no[ appear to have much value as a growth medium in the same <br />sense as topsoil. It is often saline and/or alkaline, or it contains other properties that does not make it <br />suitable for use as a dryland growth medium. However, disposing of [his material as backfill on land <br />where groundwater is near the surface and wetlands will be created is a suitable use of the overburden. <br />The leaching effect in a wetland situation will remove much of the undesirable chemistry and the constant <br />exposure [o hydric conditions makes i[ useful in wetland situations. Many wetland plants are also adapted <br />to such conditions. <br />Other stripped overburden will either be temporarily stockpiled near locations where it will be <br />used as backfill, or it will be disposed of immediately into an area that needs to be backfilled. Thus, <br />overburden storage should not become a serious problem. To reduce the amount of land that might <br />require augmentation where groundwater is exposed, use of the overburden to backfill mined areas is <br />highly beneficial. <br />Requirement: The arrangement of berms and sediment basins in Phase 1 will be done such that all <br />basins have at least one side connected to adjacent undisturbed land, and groundwater can <br />continue to flow through Phase 1 [o lands to the east of [he operation. The actual arrangement shall <br />be at the discretion of the operator so long as the connection and flow-through requirements are <br />met. The arrangement shown on Exhibit C-4A is a possible arrangement [hat would meet the <br />requirements. Other configurations are possible that would meet the requirements. <br />DISCUSSION: Backfilling Phase 1 will not be done by simply dumping the overburden in the <br />pit. Instead, overburden will be used primarily in constructing the individual sediment basin cells where <br />fines from the processing of gravels at the processing plant can be contained. It has been found [hat [he <br />bermed boundaries of these cells need to be well compacted to be stable and not subject to breakage. In / <br />the past, where such structures have been built, high compaction results in a very stable and practically ~/ <br />seep-free edge for sediment basins. Initially this is important because these cells are primarily containing <br />wash water from [he plant discharge. But as the sediment accumulates in the cells, [he water is displaced <br />by the sediment which results in an even stronger structure. Thus, much of the overburden removed from <br />Phase 1 and from Phase 2 will be used to construct the berms that define the cells. The cells, of course, <br />are put in locations where [he gravel has been removed. Bu[ the pattern of constructing the cells is <br />initially biased toward cell construction along the southern side of [he pit. Only later will cells be <br />constructed toward the middle of the pit. <br />There are three reasons for preferring the outer edges of the pit for initial cell construction. First, <br />it greatly strengthens the outer wall of the open pit. This reduces the possibility of breaching the pit by <br /> <br />Pueblo East Pit Amendment 3 (2007) Exhibit D Page 28 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.