My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-12-18_REVISION - M1978314 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1978314
>
2006-12-18_REVISION - M1978314 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 6:08:08 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:05:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978314
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/18/2006
Doc Name
Witnesses and Exhibitsfor January 10-11, 2007 Hearing
From
MLRB
To
DRMS File
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
King Mountain Sand and Gravel Mine Ecological Resources Assessment <br />Page 16 <br />6.0 IMPACTS ANALYSIS <br />6.1 Overall Habitat Values <br />In addition to the greater sage grouse, there are several other wildlife species of concern that <br />likely inhabit the Project site. Except for the sagebrush vole, these other species of concern are <br />largely restricted to the Montane Riparian Shrubland, Graminoid Wetland and Aguatic habitats <br />on the property. The riparian shrubland has willow communities ranked as vulnerable (G3/S3) by <br />C[VHP. Wetland acreage is estimated aC 33.51. The sage grouse will also use the wetland <br />habitats, particularly in late summer and fall. These wetland habitats are not directly impacted by <br />mine operations on the dry terrace tops. CDOW has rightly focused on the impacts to the <br />Sagebrush Shrubland that is directly impacted from mine operations. However, [he wetland <br />habitats obviously have significant ecological value and should be considered worthy of <br />preservation. <br />6.2 Greater Sage Grouse <br />CDOW Project related comments focus primarily on the sage grouse, and only secondarily on the <br />Columbian sharp-tailed grouse. The sage grouse is therefore the focus of this impacts analysis. <br />A lek is located approximately 1/4 mile to the northwest of the property. The ProJec[ site is a <br />known brood rearing area as well. CDOW began aradio-collar study in [he fall of 2003, <br />continuing into 2004. This study has confirmed the extensive, year round use of the Project site <br />and adjacent areas. Sage grouse have been documented by CDOW in the immediate area dating <br />back to the 1950's. The local population in southern Routt County and northern Eagle County <br />has been considered in a state of decline since the late 1950's. Due [o [his concern, CDOW has <br />completed a local conservation plan (CDOW 2004). Several other local plans have been <br />completcd in northwest Colorado, and a state wide plan is being assembled. All of these plans do <br />not definitively identify the cause of the long term population decline. The South Routt/North <br />Eagle plan identified 33 possible causes, which were subsequently consolidated into 10 primary <br />issues. The Federal Register notice describes population declines over most of [he sage grouse <br />range in [he western United States, and also does not identify with any significant degree of <br />confidence the cause of the declines (Federal Register 2004). Given [his situation, CDOW has <br />elected to build a conservation strategy based upon broad categories of passible concerns, and <br />develop conservation actions to address the concerns. Monitoring and evaluation of conservation <br />actions, coupled with further population monitoring, is intended [o provide future direction and <br />priorities. Mining is not identified as a cause of population declines in the South Routt/North <br />Eagle plan. <br />The mine operation has been present since 1978. According to Mike Jones, [he Mine Manager, <br />the grouse have been observed sheltering from the elements under the truck scale at [he mine <br />entrance, and even in [he bottom of the mine pit. The grouse have obviously persisted in the area <br />despite the presence of the mine over a 28 year period. Given that [he determining factors for <br />range wide population declines in the western United States are not known, [ha[ mining has not <br />been identified as one of the primary causes of the population decline, and that grouse have <br />persisted on Five Pine Mesa near the mine, a sensible mine mitigation plan should be adequate <br />for [he protection of [he local grouse population. <br />6,3 Objector Letters <br />DRMS received three letters of objection in June of 2006. The letters request a reconsideration of <br />the conversion of the 110 permit to the 112 permit. The basis for the objections primarily relate <br />[o potential off-site impacts of the mine operation. Objections also reference impacts [o the sage <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.