My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-08-04_REVISION - M1978056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1978056
>
2004-08-04_REVISION - M1978056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:53:44 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 7:55:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/4/2004
Doc Name
Reply to 2nd Adequacy Review Comments of 9 June 2004
From
Varra Companies Inc.
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CG <br />July z, zooa <br />Mr. Brad Janes <br />Varra Companies <br />8120 Gage Street <br />Frederick, CO 80516 <br />Subject: Reply to Comments <br />Durham Pit <br />Greeley, Colorado <br />CGRS Project No. 1-135-9540aa <br />Dear Mr. Janes: <br />The following are responses to comments providetl by Mr. Tom Schreiner of Division of Minerals and <br />Geology regarding the dewatering evaluation provided by CGRS, Inc. Mr. Schreiner's comments are <br />addressed by item. <br />Item 10 -CGRS has generated an analytical simulation that assumes a maximum disturbance and a <br />water table depression over 136 acres as presented in Varra's reclamation plan. This simulation <br />predicts no additional drawdown at the Carbaugh well as mentioned in our initial report. A head <br />distribution plate generated by the model is presented as an Attachment. <br />As described in the report, groundwater and seepage water from the Cache La Poudre River are <br />returned to the river and thus the dewatertng operations augment the river flow. Even if recovered <br />water was rtot returned to the river (which will never Ue the case) the total estimated seepage from <br />the river at the maximum mine tlisturbance (13B acres of dewatered area) is estimated at 10 cubic <br />feet per secontl. This value is well below the annual mean stream flow of the Cache La Poudre River, <br />indicating dewatering operations could not dewater the river. As long as water remains in the river <br />dewatering operations will not affect groundwater levels on the north side of the Cache La Poudre <br />river. <br />Item 11 - Page four of our Dewatering Evaluation Report explains that at the time of the report <br />submittal the depth to water in the Carbaugh well (as report by Mr. Carbaugh) was 17 feet. As the <br />well is 37 feet deep there was a 20-foot water column from which Mr. Carbaugh could draw water. <br />We estimated the drawdown induced from mining operations was on the order of nine feet. This <br />impact has already occurred and addition drawdpwn from future mining operations at this location is <br />not anticipated as predicted by analytical solutions, to the extent as described in item 10 above. <br />Item 20 -The Varra mining operation will have an affect on surtace and groundwater systems. <br />Analytical model results referenced earlier pretlids the maximum distance to any measurable <br />drawdown is between 400 and B00 feet from any dewatered mine face. Our analysis does predict <br />impact to the local aquifer, however, the model does not predict that the local aquifer will be depleted <br />as to prohibit adjacent well use, to the extent as described in item 10 above. <br />As mentioned previously, dewatering operations will augment the Cache La Poudre stream flow <br />during active mining operations. <br />C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\CoMeM.IESMJFNGA6aWewaterresponse (1).doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.