Laserfiche WebLink
Plan Map). Also, as noted above, the map scale appears to be incorrect. Other items that still <br />need to be addressed are: <br />Rule 6.4.1 - Exhibit A -Legal Description -The application states that the proposed <br />expanded azea is located in Section 27-Township 9 South-Range 54 West. The Exhibit A <br />legal description shows the acreage in Section 27-Township 9 South-Range 64 West. <br />Which is correct? The application and Exhibit A must describe the same acreage location. <br />Make the appropriate changes and re-submit the revised document. Tt appeazs that the lands <br />aze located in Range 64 West not Range 54 West so page 2 of the application form needs to <br />be revised and re-submitted. <br />2. Rule 6.4.2 - Exhibit B -Index Map - An index map showing the regional location of <br />the affected land and all roads and other access to the azea. All the maps should show the <br />access road since it is part of the permit area. It is suppose to be a 30-foot wide road. Your <br />latest map has an arrow pointing to a "site location" in Section 26 not Section 27. Is the site <br />in Section 26 or Section 27? The index map should show. the approximate location of the <br />site, including the access road (draw it on the map as close as you can). <br />3. Rule 6.4.3 - Exhibit C - In addition to requirements of Rule 6.2 (see above), the Exhibit <br />C map(s) must legibly portray the following information: <br />a) all adjoining surface owners of record. Your map shows the adjoining landowners. <br />b) the name and location of all creeks, roads, buildings and power and communication <br />lines on the azea of affected land (along the access road and parking area) and within <br />two hundred feet of all boundazies of such area. Your map does not show a power line <br />on the east side of the proposed permit boundary. If a power line is located within 200 <br />feet of the proposed expanded permit azea, it must be shown on the map. <br />c) the existing topography of the azea.with contour lines of sufficient detail to portray the <br />direction and rate of slope of the affected land (the original topographic map that was <br />submitted was identified as Exhibit F-a and did not conform to Rule 6.2). The <br />. latest topo map you submitted does not show the existing permit azea, or the proposed <br />expanded area. You need to revise the map to show the permit boundazies (which <br />should include the access road) because the outlined area on the latest topo map does <br />not reflect the existing permit or the proposed expanded permit area. In addition, the <br />topographic elevations are not the same. The elevation on the original map for the <br />pemut area was 6700 feet ams] and the elevation on the latest map is 5500 feet amsl. <br />Which is correct? <br />g) show the owner's name, type of structures, and location of all permanent or man-made <br />structures contained on the azea of affected land and within two hundred feet of the <br />affected land (this includes the weigh scales, which should have been located in the <br />east side of the approved permit azea, not along the access road). You have accurately <br />depicted the power line and the location of the scale house in the permit azea. However, <br />you may need to show the power line east of the permit area if it is within 200 feet of <br />the affected azea. Also, a fuel tank is not considered a permanent man-made structure. <br />Rule 6.4.4 -Mining Plan -the amendment application mentions "sections A, B, C and D". <br />Mining, appazently, will progress from section A, to section B, to section C, to section D. <br />This should be shown on the Mining Plan map(s). The latest map only shows sections A, B <br />and C. What happened to section D? <br />e) an approximate timetable to describe the mining operation should be provided. An <br />example would be "section A will be mined from 2002-2010, section B from 2010 <br />