My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-07-13_REVISION - M2000016 (27)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2000016
>
2005-07-13_REVISION - M2000016 (27)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:52:07 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 6:26:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000016
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/13/2005
Doc Name
permit ammendment
From
lafarge
To
dmg
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEB-II-05 IT:05 FROM-Colorado Division of Minerals b 6¢olo¢y +130386635Ei T-855 P 038lOIIr-52E <br />At-2000-016, Lafarge Wesl. Ina: Riverbend Operaran, Ah1-01 February 71, 2005 <br />Adequacy Memo Page 3 <br />t2. The applicant needs to describe how the drawdown of the pits and any <br />shadowing mounding effects will impact the structural integrity of the surrounding wells, <br />surface water drainages, activities which rely on groundwater in the vicinity of the site, <br />and vegetation on or near the site (including the cottonwood trees in the riparian area <br />near the South Platte River and the wetlands located adjacent to the pits}. The applicant <br />must also describe any mitigation measures to be implemented and trigger points that <br />would put mitigation measures into effect. <br />13. The Division has concerns that there may be effects on the amount of water conveyed in <br />the Fort Lupton Bottom Ditch, the Brighton Ditch, and Big Dry Creek due to dewatedng of <br />the pit. The applicant must project the amount of water that will be lost from these <br />structures if these structures Teak and the ground water level around the structures is <br />lowered as a result of mining activities. The applicant needs to indicate whether this <br />issue has been investigated and the results of that im~estigaticn. If this issue has not <br />been addressed, they must investigate the potential impacts to the water conveyed in <br />these ditches and submit the results to the Division for review. <br />t4. Due to the potential for permanent impacts to ground water, the applicant may need to <br />take permanent mitigation measures such as installing French drains. The applicant <br />should consider this eventuality and respond to this concern. <br />Groundwater Monitoring Plan: <br />16. Page 24 of 81 of Exhibit G and Table 1 by AMEC (following p. 27 of 81 -Gravel Well <br />Permit Application} indicate that 13 wells are within 600 feet of the site, with 2 potentially <br />impacted, and the "Groundwater Monitoring Plan" states 20 wells are within 600 feet with <br />6 potentially impacted. Please investigate and correct these values, well listings, and <br />associated maps so that the permit application is consistent. <br />76. Based upon the strong potential for ground water impacts from dewatering 12 large open <br />pits and lining three pits, additional monitoring wells will need to be selected and/or <br />installed to ensure compliance with Rute 3.'1.6(1) of the Construction Material Rules and <br />Regulations, which requires that "tlisturbances to the prevailing hydrologic balance of the <br />affected land and to the surounding area and to the quantity and quality of water in <br />surface and groundwater systems both during and after the mining operation and during <br />reclamation shall be minimized....' The applicant must also provide a list or table <br />showing Well Permit numbers and constructed depths for all the monitoring wells. <br />17. Once the monitoring well quantities and positions are deemed adequate by the Division, <br />to establish baseline ground water levels, monitoring frequency for ground water levels in <br />the monitoring wells will need to be increased to monthly. One full year of monthly data <br />will need to be collected and reported prior to beginning mining. The data submitted with <br />the application is inadequate in frequency and extent of monitoring ~ryells. A technical <br />revision will be required to reduce monitoring frequency. <br />t8. Section 32 of the "Groundwater Monitoring Plan" proposes mitigation measures for <br />alleviating offsite ground water impacts which include delivering water by "pumping and <br />piping or by a drain system," -delivering replacement water by pumping dewatering water <br />to the affected party(s), pumping from the onsite wells, and delivery from the Brighton <br />Ditch shares controlled by the operator-' II appears that changes of water rights may be <br />necessary for implementation of these mitigation measures. For water sources to be <br />legally available when needed for mitigation, they likely need to be included in the <br />Substitute Water Supply Plan ('SWSP') submitted to the Office of the Stato Engineer <br />("OSE"). The applicant must ensure this mitigation water is approved for those uses <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.