Laserfiche WebLink
-. .: - " _ -._ _.: 17186893?54 T-387 P.23/31 Job-936 <br />t ~ 26 <br />Response: To the best of CC6rV's knowledge, all owners of record of affected land and owners of substance to <br />be mined have been identified. <br />XIX. 6.4.19 ~EXHIHIT S- Permanent Man-Made Structures <br />A. Rule 6.4.19 requires the operator to provide proof either in the form of a notarized agreement between <br />the'applicant and the person or persons having interest in the structure or a demonsrratian that such <br />structure shall nor be damaged by activities occurring at the mining operation. Has the operator <br />contacted pll owners of stnectures within 200 feet of the operation and a-0"ected land, which includes <br />power. pales, fences, etc. ? <br />Response: To the best of CC&V"s knowledge, aU owners of record of structures within 200 feet of the <br />operation and affected land have been identified artd contacted. The application contains the necessary <br />infrrmaton that demonstrates that there will be no damage caused to permanent structures located <br />within 200 feet of the operation or affected land by CC&V proposed activities and that the stability of <br />stfuctures will not he edvasaly effected. <br /><<': <br />XX. RXHIBiT T- Designated Mining Operation Environmental Protection Plan <br />A. CC&V or the operator will nolFfy the Division fja cyanide spill of any amount occurs outside of the <br />protected area within 24 hours, Please remove from Volume t7/, 5pi11 Prevention and Countermeasure <br />Plan, page 30, the reference to -- !0 pounds of sodium cyanide as the reporting criteria <br />Respottsei~ Page 30 of the F.mrsgency Response Plaa has been revised accordingly. The revised pages are <br />incladed in Attachmem 13. <br />B. Rule 6.4.20 (7) (d): The applicant it rcguired ro describe, with maps and narrative, the monitoring <br />systems, etc. employed or to be employed to t:valuate the effectiveness of each Environmental Protection <br />Plan facility and activity. 77te applicant hqs supplied two mops, i.e. Figure 8-1 and Drawing 10.1, both <br />of which indicate the locations of certain ground water monitoring sites. !t is the Division's <br />understanding that Figure B-! is to illustrate the esittutg ground water monitoring sites and Drawing <br />1 D.l the proposed Amendment 8 ground water monitoring program, including some ground water <br />monitoring wells recently drilled and completed, i.e. PGMW- lA and IB and SGMW-4A and 4B. 'the <br />applicant intends, as has been reported to install a ground water monitoring we!! near the newADR <br />processing pond, then that well location is missing from Drawhtg 10.1. Furthermore, Figure B-1 does <br />not contain locations for existing monitoring wells Ct/MW-BA, 5GMW-3B and WCMW 2-55, all of <br />which were sampled and reported during 1999. !n addition, Table 8-l, which is to provide a <br />corresponding summary ojthe exisrmg ground water monirorltrg sites, does nor include current ground <br />water;monitoring wells GVMW-8A or WCIVIW 2-65. <br />- CC&Vshould suonly anoraortately revised versia~s of Drawing l0.1. Figure B•1 an,!! Table ~1. <br />~ 4 nF <br />Response: The proposed well, which will he drilled down~adient of the Phase 1, II. and III External Pond, is <br />shows on revised Drawing 10.1 in Attachment S and is proposed to be a compliance polio with pH <br />paresnerees batweea 6.0 end 9.0 end WAD cyatride of 0.2 mB/1. <br />,i <br />Figure B=1, and Tables B-1 through H-25 have been revised (Attachtttent 14) to include information on <br />GVMW-8A, SGMW-3H, and WCMW-2 as appropriate. <br />C. Rule 6'4.20 (8) (b): 17te applicant is required to idenrjfy all known aqujfers and related subsurface <br />water bearing fracture systems within 2 miles of the t~'ected lands and provide the general direction <br />