_REVISION - M1980244 (31) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- ~ --- ~ - <^uy '~ 2 ;a~ ~:; ~~. i;, ,, , Response:.. '1"0; t~te hest of CC&V's knowledge, all permanent or man-made structures within the affected land and,wit~iin 200 feet of the affected land not owned or controlled by CC&V have been identified. D. Drawi'tg GI shows a State land in Section 16, Is that the only non-private property tivirhin the amended permit area? Response: Rs lA the case oP Amendment No. 7, there arc a number of small Hureau of Land Management ("i3~.M'~ administered tracts scattered within the permit boundary, but which are aver 200 feet from the preyiou~ and future affected land areas. No other non-private property beside the State land exists within .. the ame'hded permit area. <~ ::,,. E. Drawing C-4 shows an external storage pond located south of the primary Crusher. However, no detailed design is provided for this pond. Please provicle the design for this pond. _~ Response::~'he%Bhase IV External Pond is presented in Section 4.6.3.2 beginning on page 34 of Appendix i in Volume. V of the application. Design details aze provided in this section and are explained as being the sakes asthose for the Phases I, II, and III External Pond. Drawing 24 shows the design details for the • ~~ PhaSe?Ty Extemal Pond, which is in Appendix 7 of Volume V. IV, b.4.4' .:.3;XHTBIT D - Mining 1"Can Drawing E-3 Conceptual Mine Phasing Map shows Jour phases, Phases I, II, and III show Squaw Gulch overburden storage with concurrent reclamariaa, but Phase IV does not indicate the foot pries of the Sgaaw GulcA overktirxifen storage area. However, the Phase IV conceptual map shows what appears to be r: northern extension of tlieoverburdensrorage area from the main Cresson Mine. ~::~ ' A: Is71ia~ area part of the Squaw Gulch waste storage area expansion? In order to understand the conceptual drawing. it will be helpful (fall areas ident(fed in each Phase are also identifted in all four phases:' For example the North Cresson mine is identified in Phase l and II but not identifted in Phases III and~lT! Please provide a new Conceptual Mine PhastngMap Drawing C-S shawiltg art conceptually identified areas in each Phase. Sirsce the scale is the same, it should not be difficult Jo add these areas toseaeh, Phase. 8esponse~ aarawing C-5 was intended to conceptually poraay thaw areas which maybe active at any given tifine: !.,Areas active earlier ar later in the mining sequence were not shown to minimize clutter and cdnfusion. The general depictions of "phases" were intended to be Used in conjunction with Drawing C-4. Which shows the entire mining area. The conceptual nature is consistent with the applicable regulations at Rule 6.4.4(e), . 7':' Irr response to this OMLR comment, Drawing C-Sa in Attachment 3 has bean developed. This drawing repFe§®tts a compilation of Drawings C-4 and C-S from the Amendment No. $ application. •, ~; The natttetn extension of the 3GO9A that the OMI.It refers to is aotually a backfilled portion of the Msiin~resson Mine Area. This area is mined in Phase 2 and backfilled in Phase 4 as shown on Drawing C-5. r; Tee ergs of the North Cresson Mine to which the OMLR referred to as not identifted in later phases is planned to be mined during Phases 1 and 2 and backfilled during Phase 3. The North Cresson Mine Area,is;nnt included as sn area undergoing extraction of ore on Drawing C-5 in Phases 3 and 4 because it is no longer reined at those times. Instead, doting Phase 3, the North Cresson Mine Area is being :l'