_REVISION - M1980244 ‎(31)‎

• Permit No: M1980244
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Name: Adequacy Response
• From: Cripple Creek & Victor Gold
• To: DMG
• Type & Sequence: AM8
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

•ran vaatV UU6u rm~u.
:- 3 ,.
' . '~
Permitn:~ -(~ i~ ~~ Confidental?: (
Class: (sue! l S L O- n-G -'- Type-Se
From: CC F y _ To•~ ~~r&
Doc. Name: .D e~J~tEc.`-I_ _ 0~ _
Doc. Date (if no date stamp)
y\.{.e0; V!\OJL~1 1' V HLL' V UHl.1 4 V1rllYlGl\ 1 O _ L1Y1V LG 11 L' A LH l GL LL V L\G LY• F44U
~ ;y
GENERAb ; ~ ~ '
The applictaaionappeared to be well prepared and all the required information under the Rules and the Act is
provided. ~How2yer-, since the Amendment relied a great deal on materials covered under AM-07, it would have
been helpful if the operator had provided the permit areas approved underAM-07 to give the reader a
comparison of the changes requested underAM-08.
Response: Table 1 in Attachment 1 of these responses includes the disturbed areas far various facilities
apptiived under Amendment No. 7 and the proposed disturbed areas for facilities under Amendment No.
8. The:changes requested in Amendment No. S are fully described and supported by the materials
piavded as part of, Amendment No. 8.1'crtinrnt information from previous submittals was incorporated
into Amendment No. 8. Drawing C-2 depicts the existing operations and brewing C-3 and C-4 depict
proposed. changes.
w ~;
Also, it wouldhave been helpful if the contour intervals were placed to the reaps legersd.
Response: Table 2 in Attachment 2 shows the contour interval far each map in the Amendment No. 8
application.
Ifground:watecis encountered by any oftbe Cresson minepiis, the stability ofthe effeeted ptr walls will need to
be re-evaluated„by CC&V in a timelyjashion.
~:~.
RespoASe: Nti significant saturated zones have been encounrtered in the exploration drilling phase prior to or
during mine development. Tf ground water conditions are encountered in areas that affect highwall
stabilitj+, CC&V will complete a stability investigation of the subject highwall. Such an investigation
'will bt:'completed in a timely fashion once highwall stability is determined to be an issue.
. ~.i..
ILI. bL~:# +=: E?iITT13)T C -Pre-Mining aad Minina Plan Map(s) of Affected Lands
~r ~,, !.
A. Has:CC&Y idenified ail immediately adjacent surface owners of record on Drawing C-1 ?
Response: Yes, as noted on Drawing C-1, the ownership shown is based on extensive reseazch by CCBcV and
is acqui8te to the best of CC&V's knowledge based on the information available through the Teller
County Assessor's Database, which contains all recordtd property transactions. please Hate that areas
wiithin-200 feet of the permit boundary where no third patty owners are shown are owned or controlled
by CC&V.
y t . ;a
B. Ai d atl~~known creeks, roads, buildings, oil and gas wells and tines, and power and communication lines
oh'the bred of affected land and within hvo hundred (Z00) feet of alt boundaries of such area identified
in Drawing C-2P
Itespanse: A11~known public roads, buildings (other than remnants of abandoned sttucturea), oil and gna wells
~d links, and power and communication lines on the area of affected land and within ZUU feet of the
affected land boundaries have been identified, as they have in past applications.
,;,da-:
kill surface water drainages, including creeks, are shown on Drawing Q-t.
C, xfas CC&Yldentified all owner's names, type ofstructures, and location ofa11 permanent or man-made
structures contained on the area of affected land and within two-hundred (200) feet of the afeected land?
„t•