My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-03-04_REVISION - M1986015 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1986015
>
2002-03-04_REVISION - M1986015 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:52:06 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 6:15:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/4/2002
Doc Name
Amendment Application
From
Transit Mix of Pueblo Inc
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINING PLAN <br />Nature of the Deposit to be Mined <br />The gravel deposit on this site is moderately uniform in distribution and appears <br />to follow a typical configuration. In general, the gravel is thicker near the river than it is <br />away from the river. The overburden, as is also fairly common, follows a similar pattern - <br />thicker away from the river than near the river. <br />Nearly all of the gravel was deposited by the Arkansas River. Very little <br />contribution occurred from adjacent lands. Most of that contribution was not in the form <br />of gravel but fines eroded from the surrounding, gently sloping valley sides that are <br />composed mostly of shale. <br />The gravel deposit, however, does not follow this pattern consistently at all <br />locations. Several drilling programs have been conducted on this site over the years and, <br />when taken together, define the pattern fairly well. There were some inconsistencies in <br />the values derived from holes drilled near each other, but that was probably due more to <br />interpretative differences than actual differences. <br />The cross-sections located at the end of this exhibit show a sampling of the <br />variations seen across the site. The actual mining plan was prepared using more cross- <br />sections than are presented here. On some of the planning cross-sections the gravel layer <br />was fairly consistent across the length of the section and the overburden declined rather <br />evenly toward the river. But on other sections the gravel layer varied widely as if <br />deposited across hilly country. Because these were longitudinal sections, the "across hilly <br />country" picture is an illusion. <br />More probably, these variations represent different depths of erosion by the river <br />as it meandered back and forth across former erosion surfaces. This pattern is often seen <br />in fairly swift flowing rivers, like the Arkansas. Often the river depth on the outside of a <br />meander bend is greater where cutting is more intense than near the inside of the bend <br />where cutting is more gentle. Furthermore, the outside of the meander typically has a <br />very steep channel slope while the channel slope on the inside of the meander is usually <br />more gradual. This asymmetry is evident when adjacent cross-sections are linked <br />laterally. <br />Variations from place to place can also occur because meander changes are not <br />usually smooth or gradual. Instead, meander changes are often induced by major floods. <br />If one could view the changes as if in a time lapse movie, the changes would make the <br />river channel appear to jump around. As a result of this "catastrophic" change pattern <br />which often occurs in meandering rivers, gravel deposits can vary tremendously from <br />place to place, both with respect to the quality of the material and the depth and quantity <br />Pueblo East Pit Amendment Ex ibit D Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.