My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-05-22_REVISION - M1982015 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1982015
>
2006-05-22_REVISION - M1982015 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:52:04 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 6:07:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/22/2006
Doc Name
Amendment - Adequacy Review Comments
From
DMG tas
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
writing (and specify on the revised maps) the minimum setback distance that the slurry wall will <br />be installed from the permit boundary. It is also necessary for the applicant to clearly define in <br />writing (and specify on the revised maps) the minimum setback distance the slurry wall will be <br />from the top of north bank of St Vrain Creek. Please respond. <br />5. The "Supplemental Geotechnical Engineering Report" prepared by Terracon indicates that the <br />slurry cut-off walls should be "keyed" or "socketed" into the relatively impermeable <br />competent/intact claystone or sandstone bedrock to reduce groundwater seepage. The report <br />further states that supplemental coring and packer permeability testing in the azea of Boring <br />Numbers 45, 47, & 48 indicated that the upper 5 to 10 feet of the sandstone layer was moderately <br />to severely fractured and that "keying" or "socketing" into this type of sandstone bedrock could <br />result in excessive seepage losses, and that deeper keyways for the slurry cut-off walls will likely <br />be required in this area. Further, the upper 1 to 2 feet of claystone exhibited moderate <br />weathering/fracturing and should not be considered competent/intact bedrock. In response to <br />these observations, the Division requests that the applicant submit a plan or proposal of <br />construction specifications that provides specific measures to be implemented during varying site <br />geologic conditions to assure that the slurry wall will be adequately keyed into competent <br />bedrock throughout the entire perimeter of the proposed installation, and minimize the potential <br />for excessive seepage losses once construction of the slurry wall is completed. Please provide. <br />6. The "Supplemental Geotechnical Engineering Report" prepared by Terracon indicates that the <br />possibility of groundwater fluctuations should be considered when developing design and <br />construction plans for the slurry wall installation, and that fluctuations in groundwater levels can <br />best be determined by implementation of a groundwater monitoring plan. Please state <br />affirmatively whether such a groundwater monitoring plan will be developed and implemented as <br />part of the slurry wall installation project. If yes, please provide the details of the groundwater <br />monitoring plan, such as location of monitoring stations, frequency of monitoring, design of <br />monitoring stations, length of proposed monitoring, and purpose of groundwater data collected. <br />Please respond. <br />7. In conformance with Rule 6.4.5, please provide engineering details and construction <br />specifications for the sheetpile wall shown in the proposed swimming area on the Terracon <br />reclamation plan maps. <br />8. Please provide engineering designs and supporting calculations for the sizing of spillways, <br />culverts, and/or any other hydraulic structure that will be installed in the reclaimed pond. Please <br />note that any permanent hydraulic feature will need to be adequately sized to withstand the <br />velocity and volume of flows expected from a 100-year flood event. (We suggest you refer to the <br />attached copy of the Division's "In-stream Aggregate Extraction & Reclamation Guidance <br />Document" that provides specific design criteria for sizing of hydraulic structures). Please <br />provide. <br />9. Please quantify the velocity and volume of flows expected on site from a 100-year flood event, <br />as well as the elevation of the 100-year base flood event and its relation to the elevation of the <br />spillways and lake shore embankment. Also, please quantify or characterize the expected <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.