My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-12-16_REVISION - M1988044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2005-12-16_REVISION - M1988044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:42:29 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 5:58:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/16/2005
Doc Name
Regular 112 Application
From
Schmidt Construction Company
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINING PLAN <br />The grasses and forbs are more representative of what should be here if it was in prime condition. <br />Clearly it is not in prime condition, but compazed to the northern portions of the property it is in faz <br />better condition. Section 36 also contains a more sensitive wildlife component, particularly <br />concerning the abundance of prairie dog colonies west of Coal Creek. Of course, the northern portion <br />contains a majority of the riparian forest which is important. But no additional mining will occur in <br />the riparian forest units and therefore the wildlife concerns there are faz less severe. <br />In contrast, the vegetation and overall condition of the land in the northern portions of the <br />property is much more disrupted by the various historical influences including mining, grazing, <br />military uses, and roadway encroachment. Not only is this reflected in the poorer condition of the <br />vegetation, which is composed mainly of species that dominate in a disrupted condition, but also by <br />the amount of sheet, rill and gully erosion. So, by initially confining the mining to the northern <br />portions (North Phase) it is possible that over the term of the lease the southern portions may never <br />actually need to be affected. Nevertheless, the southern land is included in this amendment because it <br />is in the lease and portions are known to contain excellent sand deposits. It may be needed in the event <br />sand in the northern part of the lease does not last through the term of the lease. <br />Specific Restrictions on Mining Locations <br />Wildlife HabUa1 Considerations: <br />REQUIREMENT: Mining in or near known, identified wildlife habitat locations will <br />only occur after full consideration of the impacts on wildlife. The following applies to all such <br />habitats: <br />On Exhibit C-7 the primary wildlife habitats aze identified. These habitats include <br />prairie dog colonies, any significant nesting sites, and the locations of any known <br />endangered or threatened species. (At this time no endangered or threatened species or <br />significant nesting sites have been found on the site, but there is a remote possibility <br />that a couple of threatened species could occur here.) Although not found, great horned <br />owl nests probably occur in the forested areas. No heron rookeries occur on the site. <br />Exhibit C-7 and the Master Map for Wildlife Habitats (as it is called in the Land Board <br />files) will be referred to prior to planning a mining site as well as on-site information <br />gathered. These maps are updated each time more information is obtained. If a wildlife <br />habitat will be impacted (mining in or near the habitat) the following must be done <br />prior to starting the mining. <br />Coal Creek Sand Resource Amendment 3 (2005) - M-1988-044 Exhibit D Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.