My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-12-06_REVISION - M1977472
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977472
>
2004-12-06_REVISION - M1977472
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 6:08:03 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 5:41:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977472
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/6/2004
Doc Name
Conversion Appl
From
Jackson County
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BLM East Gravel Pi[ <br />Exhibit G <br />Water Information <br />WATER QUALITY, SURFACE & GROUND The gravel pit is located along the divide between the <br />Michigan River and the Canadian River subwatersheds, both tributary to the North Platte River. The <br />streams' classified uses are Class 1 Coldwater aquatic life, Class 1 recreation, water supply, and <br />agricultural, except the Michigan River, which is Class 2 recreation. There are no designated use <br />impairment stream segments in the North Platte River watershed, and the project area is considered to be <br />meeting Standard #5. <br />Maintaining the "eggshell" border throughout the duration of the mining operation will result in minimal <br />surface runoff. [f any runoff did leave the north half of the site, it would likely travel to Ballinger Draw <br />(west-northwest) or Suddeth Draw (east-northeast). These ephemeral draws have livestock impoundment's <br />within a mile of the pit that would retain any surface runoff [hat [raveled that far. Runoff from [he access <br />road and any of the southern half of the pit (if any) would be captured by an abandoned irrigation ditch that <br />is adjacent to the site. It is unlikely that any other surface water would be impacted by the pit development. <br />If pit development were to result in runoff pathways, then erosion control measures would be implemented <br />to control runoff and eliminate accelerated erosion. Direct impacts from closing the pi[ would be the same <br />until successful revegetation occurs, after which more surface water runoff would remain in the immediate <br />location of the pi[. <br />HYDROLOGY AND WATER RIGHTS: Ground water uses within a mile of the mine include the Road <br />Gulch Spring, Box Spring, Victor Spring, and Dry Fork Spring. BLM holds [he water rights on all of these <br />drainages. It is likely that the mine location is a ground water rechazge zone, with precipitation infiltrating <br />through the gravel and then traveling along the Coalmont Formation. Any recharge from the mesa would <br />be expected to travel away from Box and Victor Springs as the Coalmont Formation in the area is dipping <br />to the south/southwest. Some of Road Gulch's and Dry Fork's recharge, however, would come from the <br />mesa. <br />The proposed mining plan would leave the perimeter of the mesa top gravel unmined, and a portion of the <br />recharge zone would be maintained in its existing condition. Prior to respreading the topsoil, a gravel <br />"lens" of at least 12 inches shall be spread on the disturbed site. The smaller lens won't have the storage <br />capacity of the pre-mined gravels, but precipitation will still be able to infiltrate the gravels and travel down <br />the dip as before. <br />There are no other known waters or water rights that would be impacted by this proposed mining operation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.