My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-08-29_REVISION - M1980047 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980047
>
2007-08-29_REVISION - M1980047 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:22:57 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 5:38:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980047
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/29/2007
Doc Name
Response to DRMS comments
From
Exxon Mobil Corporation
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Crlony Snare Oi~ Pm;ect. Grnoraoo M1'LRO Penh A1-rf.A47 Rev Aug 24, 2007 <br />2UU6 Attocto0 Area Status Surr•.ma~y .inn Requasl Icr RaOUCppn in AflecleC Apfeaae <br />4.2 Resource Block Reclaimed Areas <br />4.2 t Mine Bench <br />This area conssts of 56 acres, of which 27 acres are the flat surface of the m!ne bench <br />and 4 acres are an access roadway along the west edge of the bench to the mine s vent portal <br />site (A-groovy road) The remaining 25 acres are comprised of 14 acres of finished vertical <br />benched rock cuts on the east side of the bench and it arses of a 1 75'1 rockfiu slope or. the <br />south face of the bench (The vertical benched rock ruts on thc' writ slCe of the Mma Bench are <br />included wdhm the Plant Access Road, Area 19C, and are discusseq :aterl. <br />The approximate limits of the area are shown on Exhibit F-3, and post-m:ning topoyraphy <br />(current topography) is shown on Exhibit F--t The current condition of the areas is presented nn <br />Figures 24 (p 21), 43 and 44 (p, 33). Limits of the areas that will remain active affected acreage <br />after approval of this plan are depicted on Exhibd F-11. <br />The 27 acre Ilat surface of the Mine Bench and the 4 acre A-groove Road (Sub-area 6Ai <br />remain active areas. The remaining cliff faces and the 1 75:1 sloping rockfill face, adding up to <br />25 acres were !n their fins! !orm as of completion of constructon, as descntred ~n Exhibit E of the <br />original March 1980 permit appl~cahon (p.E-•591. Accordingly 25 acres of Area 6 are requested <br />for rema~at from the affected area on the basis that these meet the approved reclamation plan. <br />2.2 Upper Middle Fork (ISP Area 7) <br />This area consists of 77 acres immediately around and upstream of the Middle Fork <br />Dam. which was constructed in 198». The approximate limas of the area ere tlepicteC on Exhibd <br />F-3 The reservoir surface is approximate:y 5 acres. ano the affected land area around the <br />reservoir ~s 72 acres. Post-mining reclamation plays consisted of reclaiming construction areas <br />associatetl with the completed roller-compacted concrete (RCC) dam and reclaiming borrow <br />areas opened up, but never useC, for the originally Ces;gned earth and rockfP embankment tlam <br />design Approximate post-mining topography s depicted on Exhibd F-4 Llmds of ilia areas that <br />will remain active affected acreage after approval of this plan are depicted on Ezhibd F•1 t. <br />Current condaions in the area are depicted m Figures :through 9 bebw. <br />The possibility of the qam and reservoir trecom~ny permanent post-mining water resource <br />assets was clearly considereC in the reclamation plan submitted with the onginal March 1980 <br />perma application (Exhlbd E, p E-»8) With respect to other construction related disturbance, this <br />redamatwn plan tailed for topsoil to be useC in regraded areas where practical, ano for other <br />exposed valley slopes to be stabilized to the extent possible, recogrozmg that rock slopes would <br />not be amenable to lopsoding <br />In Upper Middle Fork. the change to the RCC design m 1982 resulletl m a greatly <br />reduced construction disturbance impact This tlisturbed area reduction occuretl because the <br />volume of the concrete dam was about 20°'~ that of the previous embankment qam, and most Cf <br />the aggregate needed for the concrete was already avacable in the form Cf marlstone ewsting on <br />the Mine Bench 'i; mile to the south. Areas that had bean stnppetl of vegetation ir. preparation to <br />open borrow sources had not yet been stripped of topsoil ', herefore, upor. completion of <br />construction of the concrete dam, all that was required in most of these areas was to re-seed the <br />areas with the permanent seed m:x apprdveC for this site. Examples of this treatment are <br />presented m Figures 8 and 9 Other areas that had already been opened to expose rock faces <br />to become yuarnes for the rockfUl ponicns of the previous embankment design were already m <br />their final form with vertcal rock faces. This area is visble in Figures 6 and 7, including the 2,1 <br />regraded zone uelow the cbfts that was amenable to stabdizabon by permanent revegetahon, <br />which was pone n t 586. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.