My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-01-09_REVISION - M1988112 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1990-01-09_REVISION - M1988112 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 9:53:59 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 5:31:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/9/1990
Doc Name
FAX COVER
From
STEFFEN ROBERTSON & KIRSTEN
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'90 C+r. 99 1&:1; $ 30i 955 394; SF:k DEN~~E F' 0 <br />BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, SAN LUIS PROJECT <br />CMLRD ADEQUACY LETTER RCSPONSCS <br />Page I of 28 <br />EXHIBIT D, MINING PLAN <br />1. On page D-14, reference to a "dilute cyanide solution" is made in <br />discussing the carbon-in-)each method of ore processfng. What is the <br />expected concentration of cyanide in this process solution? <br />RE5°Oh;SE: The expected concentration of cyanide in the carbon-in-leach process <br />solution is 0.5 to 0.75 lbs per ton of ore. The solutions are <br />expected to have total cyanide levels of approxlmatel:~ I75 ppm and <br />free cyanide levels of approximately 60 ppm. As described on page <br />D-16, these solutions are contained in sealed tanks only. <br />Additionally, the mill design inclines internal curbing and a <br />solution collection system to further ensure containme7t within the <br />mill in the unlikely event of a tank .eak (see response to question <br />5). <br />?. On page D-16, referenca is made to use of sulfuric, acid in treating <br />the tai]Ings slurry prior to disposal. An equilibrium diagram is <br />provided tc indicate that 70% of the cyanide wi)J be volatilized at <br />pH 9. What is the expected concentration of free cyanide 1n the <br />treated slurry solution? <br />R~SiCh?SF: Laboratory test methods currently available do not al~..Y an <br />accura':e and consistent determination of free cyanide. Frer _ya,~•'a <br />is unstal,le at the pH of the slurry and difficult to metsur~ ::rd the <br />test method is subject to interference from other elenents. T,tal <br />and weak acid dissociabie cyanide tests provide a mere reliable <br />indication of cyanide present 1n a solution. i3MR performed laboratory <br />testing to evaluate total, weak acid dissociabie and Free cyanide <br />present in the slurry solution. The data shows total cyanide values <br />of ".,4 ppm and weak acid dissociabie cyanide values of 3.8 ppm. The <br />iota also indicated free cyanide values of 52.0 ppm, well in excess <br />n~ the total and weak acid dissociabie values and, therefore, <br />~~sically impossible. In this case, we believe that thiocyanate is <br />~~~~sing interference in the testing. The more reliable tctat and weak <br />acid dissociabie cyanide tests indicate that actual free cyanide <br />levels in the tailings slurry are below 4.4 ppm. The 1ab~oratory test <br />data is included as Attachment 1 and will be added to Appendix F of <br />the permit amendment application. Humidity cell testing is ongoing, <br />however, preliminary test results as well as test resu',ts from the <br />approved permit indicate that the San Luis ore is not <:cidic. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.